Comparative Efficacy of Six Active Warming Systems for Intraoperative Warming in Adult Patients Undergoing...

Intraoperative hypothermia is very common and harmful in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. A variety of active warming systems has received close attention and has been researched by related scholars. However, the relative efficacy of these systems and which active warming system is preferred for such patients remain unclear. The aim of this study was to compare and rank six active warming systems regarding intraoperative warming efficacy in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of different active warming systems in warming adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were searched from five English databases and three Chinese databases. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB2). The outcome was the final intraoperative core temperature. We estimated direct effects by using pairwise meta-analysis, estimated relative effects and ranking with the consistency model to conduct an NetworkMeta-Analysis (NMA). We used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to assess the certainty of the evidence. Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the results. This study is registered with PROSPERO, with number CRD42022309057. In total, 19 RCTs involving 6 active warming systems and comprising 1364 patients were included in this NMA. The NMA once again confirmed the validity of forced-air warming (FAW) systems compared with other active warming systems, and further showed that underbody FAW was associated with more remarkable warming efficacy in different types of FAW systems. NMA was used to perform an exhaustive comparison of the warming efficacy of six active warming systems and indicated that underbody FAW was most likely to be the most effective warming system in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery; however, considering the sparsity of the network, our results should be cautiously interpreted. Furthermore, a large number of high-quality RCTs comparing the warming efficacy of different competitive active warming systems are needed.