Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025
Scleral Cross-linking Using Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Radiation for Prevention of Axial Myopia in a Rabbit Model
Published on: April 3, 2016
Corneal endothelium protection provided by ophthalmic viscosurgical devices during phacoemulsification: experimental
Sally S E Park1, Samuel W Wilkinson, Emilie L Ungricht
1From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (Park, Wilkinson, Ungricht, Trapnell, Nydegger, Mamalis, Olson, Werner); University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (Ungricht); Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (Brintz).
Purpose:
To compare the protection of the corneal endothelium provided by a cohesive and a dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) against damage from torsional ultrasound and simulated lenticular debris during phacoemulsification.
Setting:
University setting, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Design:
Experimental study.
Methods:
15 New Zealand rabbits were included. After incision, each eye received cohesive or dispersive OVD (ProVisc or Viscoat). 10 1.0 mm beads were injected to simulate lenticular debris. The Intrepid Balanced tip (Centurion Ozil handpiece) was inserted into the anterior chamber, and 60% torsional ultrasound with 50 mL/min flow, 70 mm Hg intraocular pressure, and 600 mm Hg vacuum was applied (20 seconds). Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) was noted. After euthanasia and enucleation, corneas were removed, stained with trypan blue/alizarin red, and photographed (5 ×400 magnification photos and 1 overview photograph from each cornea). ImageJ was used to evaluate cell damage and loss.
Results:
CDE was 4.70 ± 0.26 and 4.64 ± 0.10 in the cohesive and dispersive OVD groups, respectively ( P = .8647). The analysis of the ×400 photographs showed that the percentage of intact cells was statistically higher in the dispersive OVD group ( P = .0002), whereas the percentages of damaged and lost cells were statistically higher in the cohesive OVD group ( P = .0002 and .0059, respectively). Overview photographs revealed the presence of residual OVD on the endothelium, especially in the dispersive group.
Conclusions:
In this experimental study using a rabbit model, the corneal endothelium protection provided by the dispersive OVD was superior to that provided by the cohesive OVD.
