Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Followed by Primary Suture Using a Modified Bile Duct Incision
Published on: May 2, 2025
Low Detection Rates of Bile Duct Stones During Endoscopic Treatment for Highly Suspected Bile Duct Stones with No
Hirokazu Saito1, Hajime Iwasaki2, Hisashi Itoshima3
1Department of Gastroenterology, Kumamoto City Hospital, 4-1-60, Higashimachi, Higashi-ku, Kumamoto City, Kumamoto, 862-8505, Japan. saito.hirokazu@cityhosp-kumamoto.jp.
Insights
The 2019 ASGE guideline identifies high-risk criteria for common bile duct stones (CBDSs). Imaging confirmation of CBDSs leads to high detection rates during ERCP, while clinical criteria alone may result in unnecessary procedures.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Endoscopic Procedures
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) revised its guideline in 2019, establishing high-risk criteria for suspected common bile duct stones (CBDSs).
- Accurate identification of high-risk patients is crucial for optimizing the use of invasive procedures like ERCP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the detection rates of common bile duct stones (CBDSs) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
- To assess these rates in patients identified as high-risk based on the 2019 ASGE guideline criteria for suspected CBDSs.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter retrospective study involving 1100 consecutive patients undergoing ERCP for suspected CBDSs.
- Patients were categorized based on the 2019 ASGE high-risk criteria: CBDSs on imaging, clinical ascending cholangitis, or elevated total bilirubin with a dilated common bile duct.
- Comparison of CBDS detection rates using individual and combined criteria.
Main Results:
- Patients with imaging-confirmed CBDSs (Criterion 1) had a high detection rate of 93.4% when this was the sole criterion met.
- The overall detection rate for patients meeting any high-risk criterion was 86.0%.
- Patients meeting only clinical criteria (cholangitis and/or elevated bilirubin with ductal dilation) showed significantly lower detection rates compared to those with imaging evidence.
Conclusions:
- Visualization of common bile duct stones (CBDSs) on imaging is a strong predictor of detection during ERCP, yielding very high success rates.
- Relying solely on clinical predictors like cholangitis or specific bilirubin/imaging findings without imaging confirmation may lead to a higher proportion of non-diagnostic ERCPs, potentially indicating unnecessary procedures.
Background:
The revised American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guideline 2019 provides the high-risk criteria for suspected common bile duct stones (CBDSs).
Aims:
To evaluate CBDS detection rates during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in high-risk patients with suspected CBDSs based on the ASGE guideline 2019.
Methods:
This multicenter retrospective study included 1100 consecutive patients who underwent ERCP for suspected CBDSs with any high-risk criteria based on the revised ASGE guideline 2019: Criterion 1, CBDSs on imaging; Criterion 2, clinical ascending cholangitis; and Criterion 3, total bilirubin exceeding 4 mg/dL and dilated common bile duct on imaging. We compared CBDS detection rates during ERCP based on individual and combined high-risk criteria.
Results:
The CBDS detection rates of patients who met any of the criteria, only Criterion 1, and Criteria 2 or 3 were 86.0% (946/1100), 93.4% (113/121), and 50.0% (106/212), respectively. In patients who met Criteria 1 and 2, 1 and 3, 2 and 3, and all criteria, CBDSs were confirmed during ERCP in 95.1% (490/515), 96.2% (25/26), 55.3% (26/47), and 98.4% (186/189), respectively. The CBDS detection rate during ERCP of patients with at least Criterion 1 significantly exceeded that of patients without at least Criterion 1 [95.7% (814/851) vs. 51.0% (132/259), respectively, P < 0.001].
Conclusions:
Patients with CBDS visualization on imaging have very high CBDS detection rates during ERCP. However, performing ERCP on patients with only clinical predictors, such as cholangitis and dilated CBD with total bilirubin exceeding 4 mg/dL, often results in unnecessary ERCP.
More Related Videos
07:44Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Published on: March 25, 2022
07:36Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients with a Previous History of Biliary Tract Surgery
Published on: February 10, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management