Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Does Operable Stage IV Gingivobuccal Cancers Need Further Prognostic Subgrouping?
Saurabh Jain1, Sultan Pradhan2, Rajan Kannan2
1DNB Surgical Oncology Resident, Department of Surgical Oncology, Prince Aly Khan Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400010 India.
Background:
Operable stage IV gingivobuccal complex cancer is classified as Stage IVA and IVB. Among patients with Stage IVA disease, different subgroups with likely different prognoses are combined. Patients with advanced nodal status tend to have a poorer prognosis. We divided these patients into four groups: group I (T4aN0), group II (T4aN1-2), group III (T1-3N2) constituting stage IVA category, and group IV (TanyN3) representing stage IVB. This study assesses if these patients can be prognostically subgrouped based on nodal status.
Methods:
It is a prospective observational study done at a tertiary care center from July 2017 to June 2020. This study aims to analyze survival outcomes in these subgroups using Kaplan Meir, univariate and multivariate analysis.
Results:
The study enrolled 113 patients of operable gingivobuccal complex stage IVA cancer with a median follow up of 26 months, disease-free survival (DFS) was 74% for group 1, while it was 55%, 26% and 32.2% for group 2, group 3 and group 4 respectively. Patients with T4N3 disease had DFS of just 15%. Patients in group 3 and 4 had the worst outcomes in terms of DFS and Overall Survival(OS) with HR-3.7 and 3.3 and 3.3 and 3.8 respectively (p value-0.001).
Conclusion:
The nodal status is the most important prognostic factor affecting DFS and OS. Patients with small primary but advanced nodal stage do poorly than patients with advanced primary and node-negative disease. There is a need for subgrouping patients with Stage IVA tumors based on nodal status for better prognostication.
