Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

04:45
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
3.9K
Does Operable Stage IV Gingivobuccal Cancers Need Further Prognostic Subgrouping?
Saurabh Jain1, Sultan Pradhan2, Rajan Kannan2
1DNB Surgical Oncology Resident, Department of Surgical Oncology, Prince Aly Khan Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400010 India.
Summary
Nodal status significantly impacts survival in operable stage IV gingivobuccal complex cancer. Subgrouping patients by nodal status is crucial for accurate prognostication and treatment planning.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Head and Neck Cancer Research
- Cancer Staging and Prognosis
Background:
- Operable stage IV gingivobuccal complex cancer is currently classified into Stage IVA and IVB.
- Stage IVA encompasses diverse patient subgroups with varying prognoses, particularly those with advanced nodal status.
- Current staging may not adequately differentiate prognoses within Stage IVA, necessitating refined subgrouping.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the prognostic value of nodal status in operable stage IV gingivobuccal complex cancer.
- To evaluate the potential for subgrouping Stage IVA patients based on nodal status for improved prognostication.
- To analyze survival outcomes across different T and N stage combinations.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary care center from July 2017 to June 2020.
- 113 patients with operable gingivobuccal complex stage IVA cancer were enrolled.
- Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier, univariate, and multivariate analyses with a median follow-up of 26 months.
Main Results:
- Disease-free survival (DFS) varied significantly: 74% (Group I: T4aN0), 55% (Group II: T4aN1-2), 26% (Group III: T1-3N2), and 32.2% (Group IV: TanyN3).
- Patients with T4N3 disease (Group IV) had a DFS of only 15%.
- Groups III and IV exhibited the worst DFS and Overall Survival (OS) (HR-3.7, 3.3 and 3.3, 3.8 respectively, p=0.001).
Conclusions:
- Nodal status is the most critical prognostic factor influencing DFS and OS in this patient cohort.
- Patients with smaller primary tumors but advanced nodal disease have poorer outcomes compared to those with advanced primary tumors and node-negative disease.
- Subgrouping Stage IVA gingivobuccal complex cancer patients based on nodal status is essential for precise prognostication and tailored treatment strategies.

