Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Nest Building Behavior as an Early Indicator of Behavioral Deficits in Mice
Published on: October 19, 2019
Defining null expectations for animal site fidelity
Simona Picardi1, Briana Abrahms2, Emily Gelzer3
1Department of Wildland Resources, Jack H. Berryman Institute, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
Abstract:
Site fidelity-the tendency to return to previously visited locations-is widespread across taxa. Returns may be driven by several mechanisms, including memory, habitat selection, or chance; however, pattern-based definitions group different generating mechanisms under the same label of 'site fidelity', often assuming memory as the main driver. We propose an operational definition of site fidelity as patterns of return that deviate from a null expectation derived from a memory-free movement model. First, using agent-based simulations, we show that without memory, intrinsic movement characteristics and extrinsic landscape characteristics are key determinants of return patterns and that even random movements may generate substantial probabilities of return. Second, we illustrate how to implement our framework empirically to establish ecologically meaningful, system-specific null expectations for site fidelity. Our approach provides a conceptual and operational framework to test hypotheses on site fidelity across systems and scales.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Instinctive Drift
Conservation of Declining Populations
Naturalistic Observations
Habitat Fragmentation
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
Fixed Action Patterns

