Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods01:23

Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods

174
Direct methods for measuring microbial populations in a culture are essential tools in microbiology, providing quantitative data for various applications. Among these, microscopic counts, plate counts, and serial dilution are widely used techniques, each with unique principles and applications.Microscopic CountsMicroscopic counting involves the use of a Petroff-Hausser chamber, a specialized microscope slide with a grid and defined depth. By observing a liquid culture under a microscope,...
174
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

339
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
339
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods01:27

Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods

115
Estimating microbial growth is essential for understanding population dynamics and environmental adaptations. Indirect methods provide valuable insights by measuring parameters such as turbidity, metabolic activity, and biomass, enabling efficient and reproducible assessments.During exponential growth, microbial cells scatter light proportionally to their biomass, a principle used in turbidity measurements. About one million cells per milliliter produce detectable scattering, which a...
115

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing rapid molecular and culture methods for detecting fungal contamination in healthcare environments.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same author

Assessing clinically relevant endemic environmental bacterial and viral contamination in neonatal intensive care areas.

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE·2026
Same author

Measuring the efficacy of standard and novel disinfection methods on inpatient clinician-assigned phone: a 2-phase randomized experimental study.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same author

Racial disparities in healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same author

The "five-second" rule for dropped food: does it apply to dropped medical objects in the operating room? A randomized study of disinfection approaches for contaminated arthroplasty implants.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same author

Pseudo-outbreak of <i>Burkholderia contaminans</i> in a breast imaging center.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
05:45

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions

Published on: January 7, 2019

10.7K

A comparison of methods for microbiologic environmental sampling.

Sharon C Thompson1, William A Rutala1, Emily E Sickbert-Bennett1,2

  • 1Infection Prevention, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
|December 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Environmental surface sampling effectiveness varied by organism. Bacterial recovery depended most on the type of microbe, not the sampling method used for Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Clostridioides difficile.

More Related Videos

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples
07:24

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

Published on: December 10, 2014

14.6K
Soil Lysimeter Excavation for Coupled Hydrological, Geochemical, and Microbiological Investigations
10:30

Soil Lysimeter Excavation for Coupled Hydrological, Geochemical, and Microbiological Investigations

Published on: September 11, 2016

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
05:45

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions

Published on: January 7, 2019

10.7K
A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples
07:24

A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples

Published on: December 10, 2014

14.6K
Soil Lysimeter Excavation for Coupled Hydrological, Geochemical, and Microbiological Investigations
10:30

Soil Lysimeter Excavation for Coupled Hydrological, Geochemical, and Microbiological Investigations

Published on: September 11, 2016

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Environmental Science
  • Infection Control

Background:

  • Accurate environmental surface sampling is crucial for infection control.
  • Standardized methods are needed to reliably detect pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Clostridioides difficile.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the recovery efficiency of four distinct methods for common environmental pathogens.
  • To determine the impact of sampling technique versus organism type on bacterial recovery.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of cotton swabs, RODAC plates, manual sponge sticks, and stomacher-processed sponge sticks.
  • Testing on surfaces intentionally contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Clostridioides difficile.

Main Results:

  • Bacterial recovery rates differed significantly between sampling methods.
  • The specific type of organism (Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Clostridioides difficile) was the primary determinant of recovery success.
  • No single method demonstrated superior performance across all tested organisms.

Conclusions:

  • The effectiveness of environmental surface sampling is highly dependent on the target microorganism.
  • Method selection should consider the specific bacterial species being targeted for detection.
  • Further research may be needed to optimize methods for diverse bacterial contaminants.