Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Contraception Use and Pregnancy Outcomes for Alabama Medicaid Enrollees: A Baseline Analysis Using 2012-2017 Data
Pradeep Sharma1, Bisakha Sen1, Nathan Hale1
1From the Department of Health Policy & Organization, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, and Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City.
Objectives:
Access to the full range of contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), is key for preventing unintended pregnancies and improving health outcomes. In 2019, Alabama Medicaid started paying for LARC devices for postpartum women. In anticipation of evaluating the impact of this programmatic change, we conducted a baseline study exploring contraception use and pregnancy-end outcomes for enrollees before the change.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort of women enrolled in Alabama Medicaid from 2012 to 2017 was examined. Outcomes include pregnancy-end events for all enrollees, teen pregnancy-end events, and short-interval (SI) pregnancy-end events. Pregnancy events in year t are matched to contraception in year t - 1. Contraception is categorized as "no evidence," short-acting contraception (SAC), LARC, and sterilization. Bivariate and multivariate models were estimated.
Results:
Our final sample included 135,807 unique women who contributed 258,959 person-years. There was no evidence of contraception for 55.4% and evidence of SAC, LARC, and sterilization for 36.4%, 6.2%, and 2.0%, respectively. Relative risks for pregnancy-end events for SAC and LARC users were 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.0.65) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.52-0.0.59), respectively, compared with women with no evidence of contraceptive use. For teen pregnancy-end events, relative risks for SAC and LARC users were 0.65 (95% CI 0.61-0.67) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.51-0.66), respectively. For SI pregnancy-end events, relative risks for SAC and LARC users were 0.71 (95% CI 0.68-0.76) and 0.40 (95% CI 0.34-0.46), respectively.
Conclusions:
LARC and SAC are associated with lower likelihood of pregnancy-end events compared with no evidence of contraception, and on average, LARC is associated with lower relative risk than SAC, especially for SI pregnancy-end events.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
09:04Comprehensive Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Placenta-Targeted Drug Delivery Using Three Complementary Methods
Published on: September 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Birth Control Methods
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Regression Toward the Mean
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data