Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Structures of Solids02:22

Structures of Solids

14.4K
Solids in which the atoms, ions, or molecules are arranged in a definite repeating pattern are known as crystalline solids. Metals and ionic compounds typically form ordered, crystalline solids. A crystalline solid has a precise melting temperature because each atom or molecule of the same type is held in place with the same forces or energy. Amorphous solids or non-crystalline solids (or, sometimes, glasses) which lack an ordered internal structure and are randomly arranged. Substances that...
14.4K
Metallic Solids02:37

Metallic Solids

18.6K
Metallic solids such as crystals of copper, aluminum, and iron are formed by metal atoms. The structure of metallic crystals is often described as a uniform distribution of atomic nuclei within a “sea” of delocalized electrons. The atoms within such a metallic solid are held together by a unique force known as metallic bonding that gives rise to many useful and varied bulk properties.
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
18.6K
Polymer Classification: Crystallinity01:21

Polymer Classification: Crystallinity

2.9K
Unlike ionic or small covalent molecules, polymers do not form crystalline solids due to the diffusion limitations of their long-chain structures. However, polymers contain microscopic crystalline domains separated by amorphous domains.
Crystalline domains are the regions where polymer chains are aligned in an orderly manner and held together in proximity by intermolecular forces. For example, chains in the crystalline domains of polyethylene and nylon are bound together by van der Waals...
2.9K
Ionic Crystal Structures02:42

Ionic Crystal Structures

14.6K
Ionic crystals consist of two or more different kinds of ions that usually have different sizes. The packing of these ions into a crystal structure is more complex than the packing of metal atoms that are the same size.
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
14.6K
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number02:33

Lattice Centering and Coordination Number

9.8K
The structure of a crystalline solid, whether a metal or not, is best described by considering its simplest repeating unit, which is referred to as its unit cell. The unit cell consists of lattice points that represent the locations of atoms or ions. The entire structure then consists of this unit cell repeating in three dimensions. The three different types of unit cells present in the cubic lattice are illustrated in Figure 1.
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
9.8K
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes02:46

Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes

43.7K
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
43.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-assembly: From blueprints to breakthroughs.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Observing the mechanism of delayed collapse in colloidal gels: Yielding while becoming stronger.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Cyclically sheared colloidal gels: structural change and delayed failure time.

Soft matter·2025
Same author

Interfacial and density fluctuations in a lattice model of motility-induced phase separation.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Freezing, melting, and the onset of glassiness in binary mixtures.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Glassy Dynamics and Local Crystalline Order in Two-Dimensional Amorphous Silica.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

8.6K

Dimensionality reduction of local structure in glassy binary mixtures.

Daniele Coslovich1, Robert L Jack2, Joris Paret3

  • 1Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trieste, Strada Costiera 11, 34151 Trieste, Italy.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|December 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Unsupervised learning reveals key structural features in supercooled liquids and glasses. Dimensionality reduction helps understand particle mobility and locally favored structures in glassy binary mixtures.

More Related Videos

Cooling Rate Dependent Ellipsometry Measurements to Determine the Dynamics of Thin Glassy Films
09:32

Cooling Rate Dependent Ellipsometry Measurements to Determine the Dynamics of Thin Glassy Films

Published on: January 26, 2016

8.2K
Measuring the Densities of Aqueous Glasses at Cryogenic Temperatures
09:50

Measuring the Densities of Aqueous Glasses at Cryogenic Temperatures

Published on: June 28, 2017

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

8.6K
Cooling Rate Dependent Ellipsometry Measurements to Determine the Dynamics of Thin Glassy Films
09:32

Cooling Rate Dependent Ellipsometry Measurements to Determine the Dynamics of Thin Glassy Films

Published on: January 26, 2016

8.2K
Measuring the Densities of Aqueous Glasses at Cryogenic Temperatures
09:50

Measuring the Densities of Aqueous Glasses at Cryogenic Temperatures

Published on: June 28, 2017

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Statistical Physics

Background:

  • Supercooled liquids and glasses exhibit complex disordered microscopic structures.
  • Characterizing these structures is crucial for understanding their unique properties.
  • Unsupervised learning offers potential for analyzing complex structural data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply unsupervised learning for characterizing the disordered microscopic structure of supercooled liquids and glasses.
  • To assess the effectiveness of dimensionality reduction on structural descriptors.
  • To connect structural features with particle mobility in glassy binary mixtures.

Main Methods:

  • Dimensionality reduction of smooth structural descriptors (radial and bond-orientational correlations).
  • Analysis of principal component analysis (PCA) and neural network autoencoders.
  • Investigation of glassy binary mixtures.

Main Results:

  • A few collective variables capture significant structural fluctuations and correlate with particle mobility.
  • Fine-grained descriptors offer better insights into mobility-relevant fluctuations but are complex.
  • PCA and autoencoders yield similar results, with PCA offering better interpretability.
  • Some mixtures exhibit locally favored structures, indicated by bimodal distributions.

Conclusions:

  • Unsupervised learning, particularly dimensionality reduction, is effective for analyzing glassy structures.
  • Structural features identified are linked to particle dynamics and local ordering.
  • The choice of descriptors impacts interpretability and the ability to capture relevant fluctuations.