Injury-mechanism directness as a key factor for fracture laterality in pediatric extremity fractures

Associations between certain extremity fracture sites and laterality in pediatric trauma are well known, whereas the rationale for such laterality tendencies are unclear. We hypothesized that the laterality tendency of a specific fracture would be affected by directness of injury mechanism and not by the fracture site itself.

We retrospectively enrolled 1382 children (aged 2-16 years) who were diagnosed with extremity fractures sustained during loss-of-balance situations and investigated the laterality tendencies (dominant vs. non-dominant extremity) of specific fracture sites. Multivariate analyses were sequentially performed to adjust for potential confounding variables-with and without injury-mechanism directness as a covariate.

In the upper extremities, the non-dominant side was more prone to fractures (p < 0.001), especially of the distal supracondylar humerus, radial and/or ulnar shaft, and distal radius. In the lower extremities, the dominant side was more frequently fractured (p < 0.001), especially at the tibial shaft and distal tibia. However, the predisposing effects of specific fracture sites on fracture laterality were not statistically significant when in analysis adjusted for injury-mechanism directness as a covariate. Fracture laterality was affected by whether the injury mechanism was direct or indirect. Indirect injury to the upper extremity was strongly associated with non-dominant arm injury (odds ratio 0.686 [95% CI 0.517-0.991]; p = 0.009), whereas indirect injury to the lower extremity was strongly associated with dominant leg injury (odds ratio 2.138 [95% CI 1.444-3.165]; p < 0.001).

Injury-mechanism directness, rather than fracture site itself, is a key factor that affects fracture laterality in pediatric extremity fractures. These findings are helpful for improving our understanding of which factors may affect fracture laterality among children.