Circulating versus cellular tumor DNA for the detection of BTK resistant CLL clones

Arne Trummer1, Wiebke Schier1, Jürgen Krauter1

  • 1Department of Hematology and Oncology, Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.

Leukemia Research Reports
|December 2, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Detecting resistance mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is crucial. Wild-type blocking PCR on cellular DNA is more sensitive than circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for detecting low-frequency mutations.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are effective treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
  • Resistance mutations, particularly in BTK and PLCG2, can emerge during BTK inhibitor therapy, leading to disease progression.
  • Accurate and sensitive detection of these resistance mutations is critical for patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the detection sensitivity of cellular DNA versus circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for resistance mutations in CLL patients undergoing BTK inhibitor therapy.
  • To evaluate the utility of semiquantitative wild-type blocking (WTB) RT-PCR for BTK and Sanger sequencing for PLCG2 mutations.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 20 sample pairs (cellular DNA and ctDNA) from 13 consecutive CLL patients progressing on BTK inhibitor therapy.
  • Utilized semiquantitative wild-type blocking (WTB) RT-PCR for detecting BTK mutations.
  • Employed Sanger sequencing for identifying PLCG2 mutations.

Main Results:

  • Resistance mutations were detected in 75% of CLL patients progressing under BTK inhibitor therapy.
  • The assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.06%.
  • Cellular DNA detected mutations in 10 samples, whereas ctDNA detected mutations in only 6 samples, indicating false negatives in samples with low mutational burden.

Conclusions:

  • WTB-PCR is a cost-effective and routinely applicable method for detecting resistance mutations in CLL.
  • Cellular DNA analysis offers higher sensitivity compared to ctDNA for detecting low-frequency resistance mutations.
  • ctDNA analysis may miss low-frequency mutations, potentially impacting treatment decisions in CLL patients.

Related Concept Videos