Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
The importance of methods for site performance evaluation in REPRIEVE, a longitudinal, global, multicenter trial
Evelynne S Fulda1, Carl J Fichtenbaum2, Emma M Kileel1
1Metabolism Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Background:
REPRIEVE, the Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV, is a multicenter, primary prevention trial evaluating whether a statin can prevent major cardiovascular events in people with HIV. REPRIEVE is conducted at >100 clinical research sites (CRSs) globally. Detailed, comprehensive, and novel methods for evaluating and communicating CRS performance are required to ensure trial integrity and data quality. In this analysis we describe a comprehensive multidimensional methodology for evaluating CRS performance.
Methods:
The REPRIEVE Data Coordinating and Clinical Coordinating Centers developed a robust system for evaluation of and communication with CRSs, designed to identify potential issues and obstacles to performance, provide real-time technical support, and make recommendations for process improvements to facilitate efficient trial execution. We describe these systems and evaluate their impact on participant retention, data management, and specimen management from 2019 to 2022, corresponding to the period from end of recruitment to present. This evaluation was based on pre-defined metrics, regular reviews, and bidirectional communication.
Results:
Participant retention, data management, and specimen management all remained steady over the three-year period, although metrics varied by country of enrollment. Targeted messaging relating to certain performance metrics was effective.
Conclusion:
Site performance is vital to ensure trial integrity and achievement of key trial goals. This analysis demonstrates that utilization of a comprehensive approach allows for a thorough evaluation of CRS performance, facilitates data and specimen management, and enhances participant retention. Our approach may serve as a guidepost for maximizing future large-scale clinical trials' operational success and scientific rigor.
Clinicaltrials:
gov Identifier: NCT02344290.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
07:02A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Longitudinal Research
Longitudinal Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...