Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

O-cresol Concentration Online Measurement Based On Near Infrared Spectroscopy Via Partial Least Square Regression
Published on: November 8, 2019
Spatiotemporal prediction of O3 concentration based on the KNN-Prophet-LSTM model
Biao Zhang1, Chao Song2, Ying Li2
1School of Computer Science, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, PR China.
Abstract:
In this paper, a prediction method based on the KNN-Prophet-LSTM hybrid model is established by using the daily pollutant concentration data of Wuhan from January 1, 2014, to May 3, 2021, and considering the characteristics of time and space. First, the data are divided into trend items, periodic items and error items by the Prophet decomposition method. Considering the advantages of the Prophet and the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models, the trend items and periodic items are predicted by the Prophet model. The LSTM model is used to predict the error terms, and the K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm (KNN) is added to fuse the spatial and temporal information to predict the ozone (O3) concentration value day by day. To highlight the effectiveness and rationality of the KNN-Prophet-LSTM hybrid model, four groups of comparative experiments are set up to compare it with the single model Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Prophet, LSTM and the hybrid model Prophet-LSTM. The experimental results show that, (1) the daily maximum 8-hour average concentration of O3 in Wuhan has a significant periodic variation. The difference in the surrounding environment will lead to the difference in O3 concentration change in the region, and the O3 concentration change of similar stations will have a high similarity. (2) The Prophet decomposition algorithm decomposes the original time series, which can effectively extract the time series information and remove noise. Thus, the prediction accuracy is obviously improved. (3) Considering the spatial information of the surrounding sites by KNN algorithm, the accuracy of the model can be further improved. Compared with the baseline model ARIMA, the accuracy is improved by approximately 49.76% on mean absolute error (MAE) and 46.81% on root mean square error (RMSE) respectively. (4) The prediction effect of the mixed model is generally better than that of the single model and possesses a higher prediction accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is...
Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation
Two pivotal parameters are the minimum effective concentration (MEC) and the minimum toxic concentration (MTC). The MEC is the...
Neural Control of Respiration
Respiratory Centers in the Brainstem
Two primary areas comprise the respiratory center: the medullary respiratory center in the medulla oblongata and the pontine respiratory group in the pons. The...
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
