Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Nudging, Bullshitting, and the Meta-Nudge
1Head and Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma74078-5064, USA.
Abstract:
In "Nudging, Bullshitting, and the Meta-Nudge", the author responds to William Simkulet's claim that nudging is bullshitting (according to Harry Frankfurt's analysis of bullshit and bullshitting), and therefore nudging during the process of informed consent renders consent invalid. The author argues that nudging is not necessarily bullshitting and then explains that although this issue is philosophically interesting, practically speaking, even if nudging is bullshitting, it does not follow that nudging necessarily renders informed consent invalid. This is obviously true in those situations in which nudging during the process of informed consent is unavoidable. The author concludes with a discussion of the meta-nudge and suggests that physicians can use the meta-nudge to eliminate or decrease the power of inappropriate, problematic, or undesirable nudges.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Persuasion Strategies
Social Proof
Routes of Persuasion
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Conformity
Framing Effects

