Alcohol-specific inhibition training in patients with alcohol use disorder: a multi-centre, double-blind randomized...

For the first time, to our knowledge, in a clinical sample with alcohol use disorder (AUD), this study compared the effects of two versions of alcohol-specific inhibition training (Alc-IT) on drinking outcomes and on experimental parameters assessing two possible working mechanisms: stimulus devaluation and inhibitory enhancement.

Multi-centre, double-blind, three-arm clinical RCT with 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up comparing standard Alc-IT, improved Alc-IT and an active control condition.

Three specialized AUD treatment centres in Switzerland.

A total of 242 detoxified, recently abstinent patients with severe AUD (18-60 years; 29.8% female).

Both interventions [standard Alc-IT (n = 84) and improved Alc-IT (n = 79)] and the comparator [unspecific inhibition training (n = 79)] consisted of six sessions of a modified inhibitory task (Go/NoGo task) with alcohol-related and neutral stimuli. Both versions of Alc-IT required response inhibition in alcohol-related trials but differed in Go/NoGo ratios (standard: 50/50; improved: 75/25), with improved Alc-IT posing higher inhibitory demands. The control condition, an unspecific inhibition training, featured alcohol-related pictures in Go as well as NoGo trials.

The primary outcome, percentage of days abstinent, was assessed at 3-month follow-up with a time-line follow-back interview.

The group receiving improved Alc-IT showed a significantly higher percentage of days abstinent at 3-month follow-up compared with the control group [γ_control  = 74.30; γ_improved  = 85.78; β = 11.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.57, 20.40, P = 0.012, adjusted r²  = 0.062], while for standard Alc-IT no effect significantly different from zero was detected (γ_standard  = 70.95; β = -3.35, 95% CI = -12.20, 5.50, P = 0.457, adjusted r²  = -0.04).

Alcohol-specific inhibition training with high inhibitory demands increased days abstinent at 3-month follow-up in patients with severe alcohol use disorder. Such an improved, inhibitory-demanding, alcohol-specific inhibition training outperformed the standard version of alcohol-specific inhibition training, suggesting an inhibitory working mechanism.