Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
Statistical power for MACE and individual secondary endpoints in cardiovascular outcomes trials for type 2 diabetes:
Sebastian Birker1, Juris J Meier1,2, Michael A Nauck3
1Diabetes, Endocrinology, Metabolism Section, Medical Department I, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum gGmbH, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Insights
Cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) for type 2 diabetes drugs have sufficient power for their primary composite endpoint (major adverse cardiovascular events), but not for individual outcomes. This is especially true for smaller trials, cautioning against comparing individual endpoint results between studies.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) for type 2 diabetes treatments commonly use a composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
- Individual cardiovascular event data (myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death, etc.) are also reported but may lack sufficient statistical power.
Approach:
- This study post hoc estimated the statistical power of published CVOTs to detect significant differences (10-25%) in individual versus composite endpoints.
- Power was assessed using two-sided log-rank tests comparing event proportions in patients.
Key Points:
- Larger CVOTs demonstrated high power (82.3-100.0%) for detecting a 15% difference in MACE.
- Smaller, preliminary trials showed lower power for MACE (e.g., 69.1% and 50.5%).
- Statistical power for individual cardiovascular outcomes was consistently lower than for the composite MACE endpoint across trials.
Conclusions:
- CVOTs generally possess adequate power for their primary composite MACE endpoint.
- However, power to detect significant differences in individual cardiovascular outcomes is often insufficient, particularly in smaller studies.
- Caution is advised when comparing individual endpoint results across different CVOTs to assess heterogeneity within or between drug classes.
Abstract:
Cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) with novel drugs to treat type 2 diabetes have uniformly chosen the composite "major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)" as their primary endpoint, but they also report hazard ratios for individual cardiovascular outcomes (myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure). We wanted to scrutinize the power to identify significant differences with respect to individual as compared to composite outcomes. We estimated post hoc the statistical power to detect significant differences of 10-25% for published studies, comparing the proportions of patients with an event (two-sided log-rank tests). For MACE, the power to detect a 15% difference ranged from 82.3 to 100.0% for larger trials, but was only 69.1 and 50.5 for smaller, preliminary trials (SUSTAIN-6 and PIONEER-6). For individual endpoints, the power, as a rule, was substantially lower. In conclusion, cardiovascular outcomes trials had appropriate power to detect significant reductions in hazard ratios with respect to the primary endpoint, but not for individual cardiovascular outcomes. This was particularly the case for small, preliminary studies. Our results call for caution when comparing results regarding individual endpoints between CVOTs, if the aim is to identify heterogeneity within or between medication classes.
More Related Videos
07:22Glycemic Impact on Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms on Physical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Markers among Individuals Aged 50 and Over with Diabetes
Published on: March 7, 2025
05:58Mouse Electroacupuncture Fixation Device Fabrication for Electroacupuncture Pretreatment in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...