Statistical power for MACE and individual secondary endpoints in cardiovascular outcomes trials for type 2 diabetes:

Sebastian Birker1, Juris J Meier1,2, Michael A Nauck3

  • 1Diabetes, Endocrinology, Metabolism Section, Medical Department I, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum gGmbH, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.

Scientific Reports
|December 6, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) for type 2 diabetes drugs have sufficient power for their primary composite endpoint (major adverse cardiovascular events), but not for individual outcomes. This is especially true for smaller trials, cautioning against comparing individual endpoint results between studies.

Area of Science:

  • Endocrinology
  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) for type 2 diabetes treatments commonly use a composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
  • Individual cardiovascular event data (myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death, etc.) are also reported but may lack sufficient statistical power.

Approach:

  • This study post hoc estimated the statistical power of published CVOTs to detect significant differences (10-25%) in individual versus composite endpoints.
  • Power was assessed using two-sided log-rank tests comparing event proportions in patients.

Key Points:

  • Larger CVOTs demonstrated high power (82.3-100.0%) for detecting a 15% difference in MACE.
  • Smaller, preliminary trials showed lower power for MACE (e.g., 69.1% and 50.5%).
  • Statistical power for individual cardiovascular outcomes was consistently lower than for the composite MACE endpoint across trials.

Conclusions:

  • CVOTs generally possess adequate power for their primary composite MACE endpoint.
  • However, power to detect significant differences in individual cardiovascular outcomes is often insufficient, particularly in smaller studies.
  • Caution is advised when comparing individual endpoint results across different CVOTs to assess heterogeneity within or between drug classes.

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
157
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational01:22

Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational

Type 2 diabetes, characterized by insulin resistance, arises when the insulin receptors on cells lose responsiveness to insulin, diminishing the cell's capacity to take up glucose, resulting in elevated blood glucose levels. To receive a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes, a series of blood glucose tests are necessary to assess whether the blood glucose falls within normal parameters. If the result is out of the normal range, a patient may be diagnosed as prediabetic or diabetic, depending on the...
2.6K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
345
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K