Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2025

A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs
Published on: February 18, 2022
The Association of Protein Biomarkers With Incident Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction
Katherine S Takvorian1, Dongyu Wang2, Paul Courchesne2
1Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (K.S.T.).
Background:
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are distinct clinical entities, yet there is scant evidence for associations of proteomic signatures with future development of HFpEF versus HFrEF.
Methods:
We evaluated the association of 71 protein biomarkers with incident HFpEF versus HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ versus <50%) among Framingham Heart Study participants using multivariable Cox models.
Results:
Among 7038 participants (mean age 49 years; 54% women), 5 biomarkers were associated with increased risk of incident HFpEF (false discovery rate q<0.05): NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; hazard ratio [HR], 2.13; 95% CI, 1.52-2.99; P<0.001), growth differentiation factor-15 (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.32-2.12; P<0.001), adrenomedullin (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.23-2.04; P<0.001), uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein (HR, 1.55; 95% CI 1.23-1.95; P<0.001), and C-reactive protein (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.17-1.83; P=0.001). Fourteen biomarkers were associated with incident HFrEF (multivariable P<0.001, q<0.05 for all). Of these, 3 biomarkers were associated with both HF subtypes (NT-proBNP, growth differentiation factor-15, and C-reactive protein). When compared directly, myeloperoxidase, resistin, and paraoxanase-1 were more strongly associated with HFrEF than HFpEF.
Conclusions:
We identified 5 protein biomarkers of new-onset HFpEF representing pathways of inflammation, cardiac stress, and vascular stiffness, which partly overlapped with HFrEF. We found 14 biomarkers associated with new-onset HFrEF, with some distinct associations including myeloperoxidase, resistin, and paraoxanase-1. Taken together, these findings provide insights into similarities and differences in the development of HF subtypes.
Registration:
URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00005121; Unique identifier: NCT0005121.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
10:03Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management