Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2025

04:56
An Efficient Single—Person Technique for Milk Sampling from Laboratory Mice
Published on: March 28, 2025
761
Student and the Lanarkshire milk experiment.
1School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. stephen@senns.uk.
European Journal of Epidemiology
|December 8, 2022
Summary
This study re-examines the 1930 Lanarkshire Milk Experiment, highlighting statistical insights applicable to modern experimental design and observational epidemiology. It emphasizes appropriate standard error estimation and potential hidden clustering effects.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Epidemiology
- Experimental Design
Background:
- The 1930 Lanarkshire Milk Experiment (LME) investigated the effects of raw vs. pasteurized milk.
- William Sealy Gossett ("Student") provided a statistical critique in 1931.
- The LME involved a complex design with school and pupil-level allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-examine the 1930 Lanarkshire Milk Experiment from a modern statistical perspective.
- To evaluate "Student's" criticisms in light of contemporary experimental design.
- To draw lessons for observational studies in epidemiology.
Main Methods:
- Re-analysis of the 1930 Lanarkshire Milk Experiment's design and statistical approach.
- Examination of "Student's" criticisms concerning incomplete block structures.
- Analogy drawn with modern clinical trials, such as in osteoarthritis research.
Main Results:
- "Student's" criticisms are assessed based on advancements in experimental design and analysis.
- The importance of appropriate standard error estimation in complex experimental structures is highlighted.
- Potential explanations for variability in observational studies, including hidden clustering, are discussed.
Conclusions:
- The LME's complex design offers enduring lessons for statistical analysis.
- Modern statistical methods can provide deeper insights into historical experiments.
- Hidden clustering may explain inconsistencies in observational epidemiological studies.
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.4K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.4K
Group Design
9.1K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.1K
Case Studies
11.8K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.8K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
6.5K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.5K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
1.6K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
1.6K
Ethics in Research
23.2K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.2K

