Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evaluation of the NHS R67 Monogenic Hearing Loss Panel in a Single UK Centre.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2026

Same author

Machine learning in automatic detection of chordoma signature, postoperative residuals, and prognosis of skull base chordomas.

NPJ precision oncology·2026

Same author

Prognostic factors and survival after recurrence in major salivary gland carcinomas: a multicenter study.

Oral oncology·2026

Same author

Outcomes of different treatment patterns for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the anterior craniofacial area: A multi-institutional study on 578 patients.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026

Same author

Identification and synthesis of decision-making factors in vestibular schwannoma treatment.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2026

Same author

Preoperative Imaging for Cochlear Implantation: A Global Consensus.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026

Same journal

Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Ear and hearing·2026

Same journal

Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Ear and hearing·2026

Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026

Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026

Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026

Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 18, 2025

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound

Charlotte Garcia¹, John M Deeks¹, Tobias Goehring¹

¹Cambridge Hearing Group, Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Ear and Hearing

|December 8, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new method called SpeedCAP significantly reduces recording time for electrically evoked compound action-potentials (ECAPs) in cochlear implant (CI) users, making clinical application more feasible. This faster approach maintains accuracy in estimating neural health and current spread.

More Related Videos

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

The DREAM Implant: A Lightweight, Modular, and Cost-Effective Implant System for Chronic Electrophysiology in Head-Fixed and Freely Behaving Mice

The DREAM Implant: A Lightweight, Modular, and Cost-Effective Implant System for Chronic Electrophysiology in Head-Fixed and Freely Behaving Mice

Published on: July 26, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 18, 2025

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

The DREAM Implant: A Lightweight, Modular, and Cost-Effective Implant System for Chronic Electrophysiology in Head-Fixed and Freely Behaving Mice

The DREAM Implant: A Lightweight, Modular, and Cost-Effective Implant System for Chronic Electrophysiology in Head-Fixed and Freely Behaving Mice

Published on: July 26, 2024

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Biomedical Engineering
Audiology

Background:

Electrically evoked compound action-potentials (ECAPs) assess auditory nerve function in cochlear implant (CI) users.
Panoramic ECAP (PECAP) analysis estimates current spread and neural health but is time-consuming.
A need exists for faster ECAP measurement techniques for clinical use.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce and evaluate SpeedCAP, a novel method to expedite PECAP measurements.
To reduce the time required for ECAP data collection while maintaining accuracy.
To assess the feasibility of SpeedCAP for intraoperative and routine clinical use.

Main Methods:

SpeedCAP was evaluated against the standard PECAP method in 11 CI users, comparing ECAP amplitudes, current spread, and neural health estimates.
Intraoperative feasibility was assessed in 8 CI patients.
Data collection time and measurement repeatability were key comparison metrics.

Main Results:

SpeedCAP reduced data collection time from approximately 45 to 8 minutes.
No significant differences in repeatability or accuracy were found between SpeedCAP and PECAP.
SpeedCAP demonstrated intraoperative feasibility and correlated well with PECAP for neural health (r=0.73) and current spread (r=0.65) estimates.

Conclusions:

SpeedCAP significantly improves efficiency, enabling multi-electrode ECAP recordings in clinical practice.
The method is fast enough for intraoperative use with minimal added error (up to 8.2%).
SpeedCAP facilitates patient-specific neural activation mapping for CI programming and troubleshooting.