Use of timed alarm device for pediatric daytime urinary incontinence Meta-analysis of comparative studies

Michael E Chua1,2,3, Mandy Rickard2, Jin Kyu Kim4

  • 1Global Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Insights

Timed alarm devices do not improve complete response for pediatric daytime urinary incontinence (pDUI). However, these devices likely enhance treatment adherence compared to standard urotherapy alone.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Urology
  • Behavioral Therapy
  • Clinical Effectiveness Research

Background:

  • Pediatric daytime urinary incontinence (pDUI) is a common condition requiring effective management strategies.
  • Urotherapy is a cornerstone treatment, with timed alarm devices explored as an adjunct.
  • Comparative effectiveness of alarm-assisted versus standard urotherapy for pDUI remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of timed alarm device-assisted urotherapy versus standard urotherapy alone for pediatric daytime urinary incontinence (pDUI).
  • To evaluate complete response and treatment adherence rates in children with pDUI undergoing different urotherapy protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search conducted through December 2021, with an update in July 2022.
  • Included four studies (3 RCTs, 1 retrospective cohort) involving 635 children.
  • Analyzed complete response and adherence rates using relative risk (RR) and random-effects modeling; assessed heterogeneity and evidence certainty (GRADE).

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in complete response for pDUI between timed alarm device-assisted urotherapy and standard urotherapy (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.81-1.76).
  • Significantly higher treatment adherence observed with timed alarm devices (RR 2.97, 95% CI 1.46-6.06).
  • High interstudy heterogeneity noted; evidence quality assessed as very low certainty.

Conclusions:

  • Timed alarm device-assisted urotherapy does not appear to offer superior complete treatment response for pDUI compared to standard urotherapy alone.
  • Timed alarm devices are likely beneficial in improving patient adherence to urotherapy regimens.
  • Further high-quality research is needed due to the very low certainty of the current evidence.
Abstract