The impact of eye movement on postural control depends on the type of oculomotor behavior and the visual task

Recent evidence suggests that performing a task inducing saccades will improve stability when compared to static fixation. However, they assume the linearity of postural control by only interpreting the area of displacement and/or the velocity of sway. Conversely, non-linear measures could bring a complementary understanding of postural control. The aim is to examine the effect of eye movements on different linear and non-linear measures of stability. 21 healthy adults (24.0 ± 3.3 years) were asked to stand on a force platform with their feet together and look at the monitor in front of them. Five conditions were tested: eyes closed, random looking, fixed static point, saccade, and visual pursuit (gaze shift angle of 15°). Five 60-second trials per condition were performed. An ANOVA with repeated measures was completed for each postural control variables in each direction: antero-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML). The absence of vision had a negative impact on sway, as seen by an increase in sway area and variability as well as reduced contributions from the ultra-low band. The saccade led to greater stability than the random looking, as evidenced by a smaller area. However, the visual pursuit led to decreased stability compared to random looking, as evidenced by a larger area, as well as increased variability. Of note, the energy contained in the very-low band, which indicates the contribution of the vestibular system, was highest in the visual pursuit compared to the fixed static point. The findings support that the visual system is an important, but complex contributor to stability as different eye movements result in distinct postural responses with saccade and visual pursuit causing a decrease and an increase in sway, respectively.