Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A Prospective, Randomized Single-Blind Crossover Study Comparing High-Frequency 10,000 Hz and Burst Spinal Cord

Edward Braun1, Nasir Khatri1, Brian Kim1

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Neuromodulation : Journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
|December 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patterns of Muscle Health in Single- and Multi-Site Chronic Pain: A UK Biobank Normative Modeling Study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Shared neural geometries for bilingual semantic representations in human hippocampal neurons.

Cell·2026
Same author

Resuscitation attempts in patients with do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions attended by emergency medical services: contributing factors and predictors.

British paramedic journal·2026
Same author

Immune Aging is an Independent Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Detecting Features of Interpersonal Difficulties in First-Person Accounts of Schizophrenia; Automated Linguistic and Network Analyses.

Schizophrenia bulletin open·2026
Same author

Efficacy of Closed Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: A Systematic Review.

Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain·2026
Same journal

The Neurophysiologic Impacts of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Inhibitory Control.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026
Same journal

Spatiotemporal Reconfiguration of Functional Brain Networks Following Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulation.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026
Same journal

Complication Rates of Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026
Same journal

From Imbalance to Intervention: Neurochemical Alterations in Canine Anxiety and Its Modulation by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026
Same journal

Effects of Electrostimulation With the Laparoscopic Implantation of Neuroprosthesis Procedure Combined With Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy on the Functional Rehabilitation of Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: Quasirandomized Prospective Controlled Observational Study.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026
Same journal

Nasal Neurostimulation as an Adjunct Novel Treatment for Oculofacial Pain in Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus-Related Postherpetic Neuralgia.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

High-frequency and burst spinal cord stimulation (SCS) offer similar pain relief for axial back pain. Patient preference was influenced by the order of therapy tested, not the stimulation type itself.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Pain Management
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment for chronic pain.
  • High-frequency (10,000 Hz) and burst SCS show promise, but direct comparisons are limited.
  • Understanding comparative efficacy is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare high-frequency (10,000 Hz) and burst SCS in patients with axial back pain.
  • To evaluate pain relief and patient satisfaction between the two SCS modalities.
  • To identify potential differences in efficacy and patient preference.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.
  • Patients trialed both burst and 10,000 Hz SCS over sequential periods with a washout.
Keywords:
Axial back painburst spinal cord stimulationhigh-frequency spinal cord stimulationrandomized controlled trialspinal cord stimulation

Related Experiment Videos

  • Visual analog scale (VAS) scores and patient preference were primary outcome measures.

    • Main Results:

    • Both high-frequency and burst SCS significantly reduced VAS pain scores.
    • No statistically significant differences in pain relief were observed between the two SCS types.
    • Patient preference was influenced by the order of therapy received (order effect).

    Conclusions:

    • High-frequency (10,000 Hz) and burst SCS provide comparable pain relief for axial back pain.
    • The order in which therapies are trialed impacts patient preference.
    • Further research may explore long-term outcomes and patient-specific factors.