Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

177
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
177
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.6K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.6K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

74.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
74.5K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

824
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
824
Glucose Homeostasis: Regulation of Blood Glucose01:02

Glucose Homeostasis: Regulation of Blood Glucose

2.0K
Carbohydrates consumed through foods are converted into glucose, a crucial energy source for the body. In the prandial state, high blood glucose levels stimulate the secretion of insulin from the pancreas. Insulin inhibits hepatic glucose production and stimulates glucose uptake and metabolism by muscle and adipose tissue. The excess glucose is converted into glycogen and stored in the liver and muscles.
During fasting, when blood glucose levels are low, the pancreas secretes glucagon. it...
2.0K
Pulse rhythm01:30

Pulse rhythm

893
Pulse rhythm refers to the pattern of pulsations within specific intervals, offering valuable insights into the regularity or irregularity of the heart's beats as observed through the pattern of pulsation within specific intervals. A regular pulse exhibits a consistent heart rate with uniform waveforms and pulsation force, variations of which can be classified as normal, weak, or bounding.
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
893

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Plasma GDF15 affects long-term dementia risk and alters neuroimmune signaling.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Proteomic Signatures of 3-Year Progression From Impaired Fasting Glucose to Diabetes: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Diabetes care·2026
Same author

Response to Comment on Wagner et al. Beyond Glucose-Rethinking Prediabetes for Precision Prevention.

Diabetes care·2026
Same author

Colocalization of eQTLs With Type 2 Diabetes and Glycemic Traits Using Whole-Genome Sequences in Diverse Populations From the NHLBI Trans-Omics in Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Program.

Diabetes·2026
Same author

Please Tell Me It Is Only a Nightmare-The Proposed Dismantling of the United States Federal Research Infrastructure.

Diabetes care·2026
Same author

Orthostatic Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Disease, and Hypotensive Events.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 18, 2025

Simple Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Freely Moving Mice
03:25

Simple Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Freely Moving Mice

Published on: February 24, 2023

5.7K

Within-Person and Between-Sensor Variability in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics.

Elizabeth Selvin1,2, Dan Wang1,2, Mary R Rooney1,2

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Clinical Chemistry
|December 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors show significant variability in adults with type 2 diabetes. This variability exists both within a single sensor over time and between different CGM devices worn simultaneously.

Keywords:
continuous glucose monitoringmethod comparisontype 2 diabeteswithin-person variability

More Related Videos

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
12:08

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Published on: June 11, 2012

18.9K
Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
11:21

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data

Published on: July 27, 2018

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 18, 2025

Simple Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Freely Moving Mice
03:25

Simple Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Freely Moving Mice

Published on: February 24, 2023

5.7K
Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
12:08

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Published on: June 11, 2012

18.9K
Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
11:21

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data

Published on: July 27, 2018

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Endocrinology
  • Diabetes Technology
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Variability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics is not well understood in adults with type 2 diabetes not on insulin.
  • Understanding CGM sensor performance is crucial for accurate glucose management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the within-person and between-sensor variability of CGM metrics.
  • To compare the performance of Dexcom G4 and Abbott Libre Pro CGM sensors.

Main Methods:

  • Secondary analysis of data from 172 participants in the Hyperglycemic Profiles in Obstructive Sleep Apnea trial.
  • Simultaneous wear of Dexcom G4 and Abbott Libre Pro CGM sensors for two 2-week periods, 3 months apart.
  • Analysis of mean glucose and time in range metrics.

Main Results:

  • Within-person coefficient of variation (CVw) for mean glucose was 17.4% (Abbott) and 14.2% (Dexcom).
  • CVw for time in range was 20.1% (Abbott) and 18.6% (Dexcom).
  • At baseline, sensor correlation for mean glucose was r=0.86 and for time in range was r=0.88.

Conclusions:

  • Significant within-sensor and between-sensor variability exists for CGM metrics.
  • Clinicians must consider this variability when making treatment decisions based on CGM data.