Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Right Bundle-Branch Block: Should Prophylactic Pacing Be
Christopher Pavitt1, Mohammed Waleed, Sandeep Arunothayaraj
1Sussex Cardiac Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Eastern Road, Brighton, BN2 5BE, England, United Kingdom. Christopher.pavitt@nhs.net.
Introduction:
Right bundle-branch block (RBBB) is a strong predictor of the development of high-grade AV block (AVB) after TAVI.
Aims:
To assess mortality, length-of-hospital stay, and cost in patients with RBBB undergoing TAVI according to whether or not they had preprocedural permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.
Methods And Results:
A total of 121 patients with RBBB who underwent TAVI between 2009-2021 were included. A total of 41 patients (33.9%) received a prophylactic PPM by clinical preference and 45/80 patients (56%) received PPM after TAVI. Baseline characteristics were balanced. Mortality was similar at 5 years, with death in 17 patients (41.4%) in the prophylactic PPM group vs 27 (33.8%) in the no prophylactic PPM group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-2.33; P=.44). Median survival for the prophylactic PPM (4.2 years), post TAVI PPM (4.5 years) and no pacemaker (4.7 years) groups was similar. Sixteen deaths (35.6%) occurred in those receiving PPM after TAVI and 11 deaths (31.4%) occurred in those not receiving PPM (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.43-2.09; P=.90). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was similar. Compared with post-TAVI PPM, prophylactic PPM reduced hospital length of stay (4.3 ± 4.5 days vs 2.5 ± 1.6 days, respectively; P=.02). For the highest and lowest complication and comorbidity scores, prophylactic PPM resulted in cost savings of £297.32 (-2.9%) and excess cost of £423.89 (+5.6%), respectively. There were no major pacing-related complications.
Conclusions:
More than half of patients with RBBB undergoing TAVI require PPM shortly after their valve implant. A prophylactic pacing strategy is safe, reduces length of hospital stay, and is cost effective in the United Kingdom.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management


