Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2025

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
Published on: October 11, 2018
A Mixed-Methods Investigation Examining Site-Level Variation in Reach Out and Read Implementation
Manuel E Jimenez1, Jennifer R Hemler2, Nila Uthirasamy2
1Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School (ME Jimenez and U Ramachandran), New Brunswick, NJ; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School (ME Jimenez, JR Hemler, N Uthirasamy, A Bator, and BF Crabtree), New Brunswick, NJ; Children's Specialized Hospital (ME Jimenez), New Brunswick, NJ.
Implementation of Reach Out and Read (ROR) varied significantly across community health centers. Understanding these differences is key to maximizing the early childhood intervention's impact.
Area of Science:
- Implementation Science
- Early Childhood Intervention
- Pediatric Health
Background:
- Reach Out and Read (ROR) is an evidence-based early childhood intervention.
- Implementation of ROR has been inconsistent, hindering a clear understanding of its delivery.
- This study uses implementation science to explore ROR delivery and site-level variations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the delivery of Reach Out and Read (ROR) in community health centers.
- To identify and understand site-level variations in ROR implementation.
- To explore factors contributing to inconsistent ROR implementation.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods study was conducted in 3 community health centers serving low-income Latino families.
- Data included quantitative parent surveys, qualitative interviews with ROR site leaders and clinicians.
- Analysis involved descriptive statistics for quantitative data and iterative coding for qualitative data using the TiDReC checklist.
Main Results:
- 300 parents reported receiving books (84%) and guidance (73%), but fewer experienced reading modeling (23%).
- Significant variation in ROR component delivery was observed across community health centers.
- Themes explaining variation included differing perceptions of shared reading and site-level barriers.
Conclusions:
- Substantive variation in ROR implementation across sites necessitates systematic descriptions.
- Utilizing established frameworks and measurement can enhance understanding of ROR's mechanisms of effect.
- Improved characterization of ROR implementation can help clinicians and policymakers maximize its impact.
More Related Videos
09:00Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
Published on: August 16, 2024
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Longitudinal Research
Regression Toward the Mean
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...