Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Identifies Additional Mutations Other than BCR∷ABL in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Shiwei Hu1,2, Dan Chen1,2, Xiaofei Xu1,2

  • 1Department of Hematology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, N1 Shangcheng Road, Yiwu 322000, China.

Cancers
|December 11, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Investigating mutations beyond BCR-ABL1 in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) reveals ASXL1 as the most frequent. These genetic variants impact tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment response and molecular remission.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Resistance or intolerance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with somatic variants suggests additional mutations beyond BCR-ABL1 contribute to treatment failure.
  • Understanding the broader mutation spectrum is crucial for optimizing CML management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the mutation spectrum beyond BCR-ABL1 in CML patients.
  • To identify genetic variants that affect the achievement of molecular responses during TKI therapy.
  • To correlate specific mutations with clinical outcomes and response to different TKI therapies.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective evaluation of 151 CML patients undergoing TKI therapy.
  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of 22 CML patients at diagnosis to identify mutations other than BCR-ABL1.
  • Statistical analysis to correlate mutation status with molecular response milestones (MMR, MR4.0, MR4.5) and clinical characteristics.

Main Results:

  • ASXL1 mutations were the most frequent (40.9%).
  • NOTCH3 and RELN mutations were associated with failure to achieve major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months.
  • ASXL1 mutation frequency was higher in patients not achieving MR4.0 at 36 months (p = 0.023).
  • Presence of >2 gene mutations adversely impacted achieving MR4.5 at 12 months (p = 0.024).
  • Hemoglobin concentration and MMR were independent factors for deep molecular response (DMR).
  • Initial 2nd-generation TKI therapy showed better molecular response achievement than 1st-generation TKI therapy.

Conclusions:

  • Mutations beyond BCR-ABL1, particularly ASXL1, significantly influence TKI treatment efficacy and molecular response in CML.
  • Specific mutations (NOTCH3, RELN) and the number of mutations (>2) are linked to poorer response.
  • ELTS and Socal scores show potential for predicting TKI efficacy and non-BCR-ABL1 mutations, respectively.
  • Clinical factors like hemoglobin and TKI generation are important for achieving deep molecular response.