Antenatal prediction models for outcomes of extremely and very preterm infants based on machine learning
Takafumi Ushida1,2, Tomomi Kotani3,4, Joji Baba5
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan. u-taka23@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Insights
Machine learning models significantly improve the prediction of severe infant outcomes in preterm infants. Gestational age, birth weight, and antenatal corticosteroids are key risk factors identified by this approach.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal research
- Medical informatics
- Machine learning in healthcare
Background:
- Predicting adverse outcomes in preterm infants is crucial for perinatal care and parental counseling.
- Current methods may not fully capture the complexity of risk factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if machine learning (ML) improves severe infant outcome prediction compared to conventional logistic models.
- To identify key maternal and fetal factors contributing to adverse outcomes in preterm infants.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 31,157 preterm infants (<32 weeks gestation, ≤1500g) from the Neonatal Research Network of Japan (2006-2015).
- Developed conventional logistic and six ML models using 12 maternal/fetal factors.
- Evaluated model discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and factor importance with SHAP values.
Main Results:
- ML models demonstrated superior predictive ability over conventional models for all infant outcomes.
- Gradient boosting decision tree models showed significantly higher AUROCs for in-hospital death and short-term adverse outcomes.
- SHAP analysis identified gestational age, birth weight, and antenatal corticosteroid treatment as the most influential factors.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning models offer enhanced prediction of severe infant outcomes in preterm neonates.
- The ML approach provides valuable insights into significant risk factors, aiding clinical decision-making and counseling.
Purpose:
Predicting individual risks for adverse outcomes in preterm infants is necessary for perinatal management and antenatal counseling for their parents. To evaluate whether a machine learning approach can improve the prediction of severe infant outcomes beyond the performance of conventional logistic models, and to identify maternal and fetal factors that largely contribute to these outcomes.
Methods:
A population-based retrospective study was performed using clinical data of 31,157 infants born at < 32 weeks of gestation and weighing ≤ 1500 g, registered in the Neonatal Research Network of Japan between 2006 and 2015. We developed a conventional logistic model and 6 types of machine learning models based on 12 maternal and fetal factors. Discriminative ability was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs), and the importance of each factor in terms of its contribution to outcomes was evaluated using the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) value.
Results:
The AUROCs of the most discriminative machine learning models were better than those of the conventional models for all outcomes. The AUROCs for in-hospital death and short-term adverse outcomes in the gradient boosting decision tree were significantly higher than those in the conventional model (p = 0.015 and p = 0.002, respectively). The SHAP value analyses showed that gestational age, birth weight, and antenatal corticosteroid treatment were the three most important factors associated with severe infant outcomes.
Conclusion:
Machine learning models improve the prediction of severe infant outcomes. Moreover, the machine learning approach provides insight into the potential risk factors for severe infant outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Regression Toward the Mean


