Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A randomized study comparing two methods of performing the breast stimulation stress test.

R K Moenning, W C Hill

    Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing : JOGNN
    |July 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary

    Breast stimulation, used for fetal well-being tests, showed no difference in efficacy or safety between manual nipple rolling and using warm compresses before stimulation. Both methods proved equally effective and safe for inducing uterine activity.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Jumping the broom toward eliminating health disparities. Presidential address.

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·1999
    Same author

    Placenta previa, placenta abruptio.

    Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·1998
    Same author

    Proteus pyomyositis of the piriformis muscle in a swimmer.

    Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·1998
    Same author

    Risks and complications of tocolysis.

    Clinical obstetrics and gynecology·1995
    Same author

    Perinatal bacteremia due to group F streptococci.

    American journal of perinatology·1992
    Same author

    Home uterine activity monitoring.

    Clinics in perinatology·1992

    Area of Science:

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
    • Reproductive Physiology

    Background:

    • Breast stimulation is a common method for inducing uterine activity during antenatal testing for fetal well-being.
    • Various techniques exist for breast stimulation, but their comparative effectiveness and safety are not well-established.
    • The breast stimulation stress test is utilized to assess fetal health in high-risk pregnancies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficacy and safety of two distinct breast stimulation methods for inducing uterine activity.
    • To determine if manual nipple rolling is more or less effective than using warm compresses prior to stimulation.
    • To evaluate the safety profile of each breast stimulation technique in high-risk obstetric patients.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • A randomized study involving 54 high-risk pregnant patients.
  • Group 1: Intermittent manual stimulation of a bare nipple.
  • Group 2: Application of moist, warm washcloths to the breasts for five minutes, followed by stimulation.

    • Main Results:

    • No statistically significant differences were observed in the efficacy of inducing uterine activity between the two groups.
    • Both methods demonstrated comparable safety profiles, with no adverse events reported.
    • The study found no superior method for breast stimulation in this context.

    Conclusions:

    • Manual nipple rolling and breast stimulation preceded by warm compresses are equally effective and safe for antenatal testing.
    • Current evidence does not support one method over the other for inducing uterine activity.
    • Further research could explore patient comfort and long-term outcomes associated with different stimulation techniques.