Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

05:35
Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
6.7K
Early parental causal language input predicts children's later causal verb understanding
Aslı Aktan-Erciyes1, Tilbe Göksun2
1Kadir Has University, Turkey.
Journal of Child Language
|December 12, 2022
Summary
Parental language input during free play, specifically morphological causatives, aids children's understanding of causal verbs. This contrasts with guided play, showing context matters for language acquisition.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Linguistic Psychology
- Child Language Acquisition
Background:
- Causal constructions in verbs vary across languages.
- Turkish exhibits both lexical and morphological causative verb forms.
- Understanding how parental input influences children's grasp of causal verbs is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if parental causal language input differs between guided and free play.
- To determine if early parental causal input predicts children's comprehension of causal verbs.
- To explore the impact of specific causative forms (lexical vs. morphological) and play contexts.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal study with 29 infants across three time points.
- Analysis of parental causal language input during guided and free play sessions.
- Child verb comprehension and vocabulary tasks administered at the final time point.
Main Results:
- Parents used lexical causatives more than morphological ones in guided play.
- In free play, this difference was observed only at Time 2.
- Morphological causative input during free play, but not lexical, predicted children's causal verb comprehension.
Conclusions:
- Specific types of parental causal input are important for children's causal verb understanding.
- The context of play (free vs. guided) significantly influences the relationship between input and comprehension.
- Findings highlight the nuanced role of early language exposure in developing causal reasoning through verbs.
Related Concept Videos
Language Development
425
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
425
Language and Cognition
409
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
409
The Nativist Approach
101
The nativist approach to infant cognitive development proposes that infants are born with inherent knowledge structures that allow them to interpret the world almost immediately. This perspective contrasts with earlier developmental theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget, which emphasized a more gradual acquisition of cognitive abilities through interaction with the environment. One key concept in this approach is object permanence — the understanding that objects continue to...
101
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
482
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
482
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
423
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
423
Correlation and Causation
38.0K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
38.0K

