Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
Published on: April 14, 2014
Analysis of Retinal Structure and Electrophysiological Function in Visual Snow Syndrome: An Exploratory Case Series
Nathaniel J Zaroban1, Sachin Kedar, David Anderson
1University of Nebraska Medical Center (NZ), University of Nebraska College of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska; Department of Ophthalmology (SK), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; University of Nebraska Medical Center (DA), Truhlsen Eye Institute, Omaha, Nebraska; and Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (A-AV), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Background:
Visual snow (VS) is a rare but distressing phenomenon of persistent granular or pixelated visual distortions that may occur in isolation or as a component of visual snow syndrome (VSS). The current understanding of VS pathogenesis, including the role of retinal involvement structurally and functionally, is limited. The objective of this study is to investigate retinal structural and electrophysiological abnormalities in VS.
Methods:
This retrospective case series included 8 subjects (7 with VSS and 1 with isolated VS). Patients with other ocular and neurologic diseases were excluded. Data were assessed from automated perimetry, optical coherence tomography (OCT), visual evoked potential (VEP), and full-field electroretinography (ffERG) testing. The VEP and ffERG data of visual snow subjects were compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects for statistical significance.
Results:
The mean age of the cohort was 29.4 years (SD = ±5.3) with 50% gender split. The mean age of VS onset was 24.2 years (SD = ±3.8). All subjects had normal visual acuity, color vision, brain MRI, automated perimetry, OCT parameters (peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and macular ganglion cell layer thickness), and P100 and N135 wave pattern on VEP. Compared with controls, VS subjects had a greater mean b-wave amplitude in response to light-adapted 3.0 stimuli ( t test; P = 0.035 right eye and P = 0.072 left eye), greater mean light-adapted 3.0 flicker amplitude ( t test; P = 0.028 right eye P = 0.166 left eye) and greater b-wave amplitude in response to dark-adapted 10.0 stimuli ( t test; P = 0.102 right eye; P = 0.017 left eye) on ERG.
Conclusions:
Patients with VS and VSS have normal retinal structure, but abnormal electrophysiology compared with control subjects. The increased b-wave and flicker amplitudes observed with ffERG suggest increased responsiveness of the rod and cone photoreceptors and may contribute to VS pathophysiology.
More Related Videos
06:34Using the Electroretinogram to Assess Function in the Rodent Retina and the Protective Effects of Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning
Published on: June 9, 2015
07:11Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020