Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025
The relationship between the esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection technical difficulty and its intraoperative
Tasuku Furube1, Masashi Takeuchi1, Hirofumi Kawakubo2
1Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Estimating esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) difficulty is key to reducing complications. The intraoperative process, especially the early phase, significantly predicts technical difficulty, paving the way for AI-based evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Innovation
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Estimating esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technical difficulty is crucial for minimizing patient complications.
- Endoscopic procedure duration is a recognized factor influencing technical difficulty.
- This study explores the link between esophageal ESD technical difficulty and its intraoperative phases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the relationship between esophageal ESD technical difficulty and its intraoperative process.
- To establish a foundation for automatic technical difficulty recognition using artificial intelligence (AI).
Main Methods:
- Seventy-five patients with superficial esophageal cancer undergoing ESD were enrolled.
- A technical difficulty score was developed, incorporating procedure duration, en bloc resection, and complications.
- Perioperative factors, specifically the intraoperative process, were investigated as predictors of technical difficulty.
Main Results:
- 11% of patients were classified as high difficulty, while 89% were low difficulty.
- The intraoperative process, defined by the duration of endoscopic phases, showed a significant correlation with technical difficulty.
- The submucosal dissection phase (AUC 0.902), marking phase (AUC 0.827), and early phase (AUC 0.847) were strongly associated with technical difficulty.
Conclusions:
- The intraoperative process, particularly the early phase, is a strong indicator of esophageal ESD technical difficulty.
- This research highlights the potential for AI-driven systems to automatically evaluate esophageal ESD technical difficulty.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...

