Erythroid/megakaryocytic differentiation confers BCL-XL dependency and venetoclax resistance in acute myeloid leukemia
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Intracellular Phosphoflow Cytometry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenotransplants
Published on: June 6, 2025
Heikki Kuusanmäki1,2,3, Olli Dufva4,5,6, Markus Vähä-Koskela1
1Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract:
Myeloid neoplasms with erythroid or megakaryocytic differentiation include pure erythroid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome with erythroid features, and acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (FAB M7) and are characterized by poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Here, we investigate the drug sensitivity landscape of these rare malignancies. We show that acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells with erythroid or megakaryocytic differentiation depend on the antiapoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma (BCL)-XL, rather than BCL-2, using combined ex vivo drug sensitivity testing, genetic perturbation, and transcriptomic profiling. High-throughput screening of >500 compounds identified the BCL-XL-selective inhibitor A-1331852 and navitoclax as highly effective against erythroid/megakaryoblastic leukemia cell lines. In contrast, these AML subtypes were resistant to the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax, which is used clinically in the treatment of AML. Consistently, genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 and RNAi screening data demonstrated the striking essentiality of BCL-XL-encoding BCL2L1 but not BCL2 or MCL1, for the survival of erythroid/megakaryoblastic leukemia cell lines. Single-cell and bulk transcriptomics of patient samples with erythroid and megakaryoblastic leukemias identified high BCL2L1 expression compared with other subtypes of AML and other hematological malignancies, where BCL2 and MCL1 were more prominent. BCL-XL inhibition effectively killed blasts in samples from patients with AML with erythroid or megakaryocytic differentiation ex vivo and reduced tumor burden in a mouse erythroleukemia xenograft model. Combining the BCL-XL inhibitor with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib showed synergistic and durable responses in cell lines. Our results suggest targeting BCL-XL as a potential therapy option in erythroid/megakaryoblastic leukemias and highlight an AML subgroup with potentially reduced sensitivity to venetoclax-based treatments.
Insights
Myeloid neoplasms with erythroid or megakaryocytic differentiation are sensitive to BCL-XL inhibition, not BCL-2 inhibitors like venetoclax. Targeting BCL-XL offers a promising therapeutic strategy for these rare leukemias.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Myeloid neoplasms with erythroid or megakaryocytic differentiation, including acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (FAB M7), present poor prognoses and limited therapeutic avenues.
- These rare leukemias exhibit distinct dependencies compared to other acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the drug sensitivity landscape of myeloid neoplasms with erythroid or megakaryocytic differentiation.
- To identify potential therapeutic targets and evaluate novel treatment strategies for these challenging malignancies.
Main Methods:
- Ex vivo drug sensitivity testing, genetic perturbation (CRISPR-Cas9, RNAi), and transcriptomic profiling (single-cell and bulk) were employed.
- High-throughput screening of over 500 compounds was conducted to identify effective agents.
- In vivo studies utilized a mouse erythroleukemia xenograft model.
Main Results:
- Erythroid/megakaryoblastic leukemia cells demonstrated a dependency on BCL-XL, not BCL-2, for survival.
- BCL-XL-selective inhibitors (A-1331852, navitoclax) were highly effective, while the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax showed resistance.
- High BCL2L1 (BCL-XL encoding) expression was observed in patient samples, contrasting with other AML subtypes.
- BCL-XL inhibition reduced tumor burden in a xenograft model, and combination therapy with a JAK inhibitor (ruxolitinib) showed synergistic effects.
Conclusions:
- Targeting BCL-XL represents a potential therapeutic strategy for erythroid/megakaryoblastic leukemias.
- This AML subgroup may exhibit reduced sensitivity to venetoclax-based treatments, necessitating alternative therapeutic approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Differentiation of Common Myeloid Progenitor Cells
Lineage Commitment
Disorders of Leukocytes
Leukopenia may result from bone marrow disorders, autoimmune diseases, and infectious diseases. For example, conditions such as multiple myeloma and aplastic anemia can impair the bone marrow's ability to produce adequate leukocytes. Similarly, autoimmune diseases like lupus and viral infections such as HIV can prompt the immune...
B Cell Activation and Differentiation
When naive B cells encounter a specific antigen that can bind to the B cell receptor (BCR) on their surface, they undergo sensitization to respond to the antigen's presence. Sensitization begins with...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Production of Formed Elements
Most HSCs commit to...

