Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Adaptive phase 2/3 designs for oncology drug development - Time to hedge
1Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA.
Abstract:
Randomized-controlled Phase 2 trials are routinely skipped in oncology drug development in favor of directly going to confirmatory Phase 3 after signal-detection post dose-finding in Phase 1. With improved standard-of-care, this speed-oriented aggressive approach is not sustainable. It is time to apply the state-of-art adaptive 2-in-1 Phase 2/3 designs to mitigate the risk of costly Phase 3 failures and allow a study to choose the optimal path to success.
Insights
Oncology drug development often skips Phase 2 trials. Adaptive Phase 2/3 designs can prevent costly Phase 3 failures and optimize drug development pathways.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trial Design
- Drug Development
Background:
- Randomized-controlled Phase 2 trials are frequently omitted in oncology drug development.
- The current practice involves proceeding directly to Phase 3 trials after Phase 1 signal detection.
- This speed-focused approach is becoming unsustainable due to improvements in the standard of care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To advocate for the adoption of adaptive 2-in-1 Phase 2/3 designs in oncology.
- To highlight the risks associated with skipping Phase 2 trials and proceeding directly to Phase 3.
- To propose a more efficient and robust clinical trial strategy.
Main Methods:
- Discussion of current oncology drug development paradigms.
- Analysis of the limitations of traditional Phase 1 to Phase 3 progression.
- Proposal of adaptive Phase 2/3 designs as a state-of-the-art alternative.
Main Results:
- Skipping Phase 2 trials increases the risk of expensive Phase 3 trial failures.
- Adaptive designs offer a more flexible and efficient approach to clinical trials.
- Optimizing study pathways can lead to more successful drug development.
Conclusions:
- The omission of Phase 2 trials in oncology is a risky and unsustainable practice.
- Implementing adaptive Phase 2/3 designs can mitigate risks and improve success rates.
- Adopting advanced trial designs is crucial for modern oncology drug development.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
Drug Discovery: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

