[Accuracy of two different registration methods of dynamic navigation system for dental implant placement]

Objective: To compare cusp and U-tube registration methods of dynamic navigation system in dental implant placement. Methods: Twenty resin mandible models and 40 implants were utilized, with implants being placed by a single researcher using one of the two registration methods selected at random. Accuracy was measured through the superimposition of the final and planned implant positions. Angular deviation, three-dimensional (3D) entry deviation, and 3D apex deviation were analyzed. Results: The 3D entry deviation, and 3D apex deviation and angular deviation of cusp group and U-tube group were (1.07±0.46) and (0.93±0.54) mm, (1.16±0.55) and (1.03±0.53) mm, 2.06°±0.98°and 1.62°±0.97°. No significant differences (t=0.91, P=0.368; t=0.79, P=0.436; t=1.42, P=0.164) were observed when comparing these two registration methods. Conclusions: Both the cusp and U-tube registration methods are highly accurate when implemented in vitro. The cusp registration technique can also overcome several of the limitations of the U-tube approach, and it is convenient for clinic.