Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Developing evidence-based resources for evaluating postgraduate trainees in the biomedical sciences
Jacqueline E McLaughlin1, Rebekah L Layton2, Paul B Watkins3
1Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Center for Innovative Pharmacy Education and Research, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Developing effective program evaluation tools is crucial for biomedical training programs. This study identified key trainee skills and program characteristics needing enhanced evaluation, creating shared resources for program directors.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Sciences
- Higher Education
- Program Evaluation
Background:
- Postgraduate trainees significantly contribute to institutional academic strength through research, innovation, and mentorship.
- Effective program evaluation is essential for ensuring postgraduate training programs meet their objectives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop evidence-based evaluation tools for federally funded biomedical training programs.
- To enhance program evaluation capacity across institutions by creating shareable resources.
Main Methods:
- A multi-phased, sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach was employed.
- Data were collected via document analysis, focus groups, interviews, and surveys from trainees, employers, leaders, and program directors.
- Inductive coding and descriptive analysis were used to identify key themes.
Main Results:
- Two main categories emerged: Trainee Skills (6 themes) and Program Characteristics (6 themes).
- Program directors identified a need for improved evaluation of communication, social/behavioral skills, collaboration, training environment, trainee outcomes, and offered opportunities.
- Evidence-based evaluation tools, including surveys and interview scripts, were developed.
Conclusions:
- The study successfully identified critical areas for postgraduate biomedical training program evaluation.
- Developed resources are available on a public website to support program directors in enhancing their evaluation capacity.
- This initiative aims to standardize and improve the quality of program evaluation in federally funded biomedical training programs.
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...