Validation of an EMG submaximal method to calibrate a novel dynamic EMG-driven musculoskeletal model of the trunk:...

Multijoint EMG-assisted optimization models are reliable tools to predict muscle forces as they account for inter- and intra-individual variations in activation. However, the conventional method of normalizing EMG signals using maximum voluntary contractions (MVCs) is problematic and introduces major limitations. The sub-maximal voluntary contraction (SVC) approaches have been proposed as a remedy, but their performance against the MVC approach needs further validation particularly during dynamic tasks.

To compare model outcomes between MVC and SVC approaches, nineteen healthy subjects performed a dynamic lifting task with two loading conditions.

Results demonstrated that these two approaches produced highly correlated results with relatively small absolute and relative differences (<10 %) when considering highly-aggregated model outcomes (e.g. compression forces, stability indices). Larger differences were, however, observed in estimated muscle forces. Although some model outcomes, e.g. force of abdominal muscles, were statistically different, their effect sizes remained mostly small (η_G² ≤ 0.13) and in a few cases moderate (η_G² ≤ 0.165).

The findings highlight that the MVC calibration approach can reliably be replaced by the SVC approach when the true MVC exertion is not accessible due to pain, kinesiophobia and/or the lack of proper training.