Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

A Simple and Inexpensive Running Wheel Model for Progressive Resistance Training in Mice
Published on: April 28, 2022
Muscle Hypertrophy Is Affected by Volume Load Progression Models
Sanmy R Nóbrega1, Maíra C Scarpelli, Cintia Barcelos
1MUSCULAB-Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Resistance Training, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of São Carlos-UFSCar, São Carlos, Brazil.
The repetition zone (RM Zone) model led to greater muscle hypertrophy (cross-sectional area gains) compared to the percentage of 1 repetition maximum (%1RM) model. Both models showed similar muscle strength improvements and accumulated volume load.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Sports Science
- Muscle Physiology
Background:
- Progressive overload is crucial for muscle hypertrophy.
- Different training progression models, such as percentage of 1 repetition maximum (%1RM) and repetition zones (RM Zone), are used to achieve this.
- Understanding the impact of these models on volume load progression, muscle strength, and muscle size is important for optimizing training programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of %1RM and RM Zone progression models on volume load progression (VLPro), muscle strength, and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA).
- To investigate the relationships between VLPro, accumulated volume load (VLAccu), 1RM, and CSA increases.
Main Methods:
- Exploratory secondary data analysis of 24 untrained men divided into %1RM and RM Zone groups.
- Training interventions were carried out to muscle failure over 24 sessions.
- Muscle strength (1RM) and CSA were assessed pre- and post-intervention.
- Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare groups, with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
Main Results:
- The RM Zone group exhibited a significantly greater rate of volume load progression (% per session) compared to the %1RM group (p < 0.05).
- Significant positive relationships were observed between 1RM and VLProg (p < 0.05) and between CSA and VLProg (p < 0.05).
- While no differences in accumulated volume load (VLAccu) or muscle strength gains were found, the RM Zone group demonstrated significantly greater absolute and relative increases in muscle CSA (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- The RM Zone progression model resulted in a higher rate of volume load progression and superior muscle cross-sectional area gains compared to the %1RM model.
- Both progression models yielded similar improvements in accumulated volume load and muscle strength.
- These findings suggest that the RM Zone model may be more effective for promoting muscle hypertrophy in untrained individuals.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
Regulation of Stroke Volume
Preload refers to the degree of stretch on the heart before it contracts. It's analogous to the stretching of a rubber band; the more it's stretched, the more forcefully it snaps back. This concept is encapsulated in the Frank-Starling law of the...
Cardiac Output II: Effect of Stroke Volume on Cardiac Output
Preload
Preload refers to the initial elongation of the cardiac myocytes before contraction and is related to the volume of blood filling the heart at the end of diastole, or end-diastolic volume. The...
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

