Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Chlorthalidone vs. Hydrochlorothiazide for Hypertension-Cardiovascular Events
Areef Ishani1, William C Cushman1, Sarah M Leatherman1
1From Minneapolis Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, and the Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota - both in Minneapolis (A.I.); Medical Service, Memphis VA Medical Center, and the Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center - both in Memphis (W.C.C.); the Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, VA Boston Healthcare System (S.M.L., R.A.L., P.W., C.H., A.K., M.T.B., L.D.F., R.E.F.), the Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health (S.M.L., R.A.L.), and the Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine (M.T.B., R.E.F.) - all in Boston; Pharmacy Benefits Management Services (P.A.G.) and the Office of Research and Development (G.D.H.), Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, and the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles - both in Los Angeles (P.A.G.); and Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine - both in Houston (A.A.T.).
Insights
Chlorthalidone did not show superiority over hydrochlorothiazide in preventing major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. Both drugs demonstrated similar efficacy, though chlorthalidone was associated with higher rates of hypokalemia.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The comparative effectiveness of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in hypertension management remains unclear.
- Thiazide diuretics are a cornerstone in hypertension treatment, necessitating clear guidance on optimal agent selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of chlorthalidone versus hydrochlorothiazide in preventing MACE in older adults with hypertension.
- To assess the safety profiles of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide in the target patient population.
Main Methods:
- A pragmatic randomized trial involving 13,523 adults aged 65+ with hypertension, previously on hydrochlorothiazide.
- Participants were randomized to continue hydrochlorothiazide or switch to chlorthalidone at standard doses.
- The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events and non-cancer-related death, with safety monitoring.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the primary composite outcome was observed between the chlorthalidone group (10.4%) and the hydrochlorothiazide group (10.0%) after a median follow-up of 2.4 years (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94-1.16).
- Individual components of the primary outcome did not differ significantly between the groups.
- The incidence of hypokalemia was significantly higher in the chlorthalidone group (6.0%) compared to the hydrochlorothiazide group (4.4%).
Conclusions:
- In this large pragmatic trial, chlorthalidone did not demonstrate superior efficacy over hydrochlorothiazide in reducing major cardiovascular outcomes or non-cancer-related deaths.
- The findings suggest that commonly used doses of these thiazide diuretics offer comparable cardiovascular protection, but chlorthalidone is associated with a higher risk of hypokalemia.
Background:
Whether chlorthalidone is superior to hydrochlorothiazide for preventing major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension is unclear.
Methods:
In a pragmatic trial, we randomly assigned adults 65 years of age or older who were patients in the Department of Veterans Affairs health system and had been receiving hydrochlorothiazide at a daily dose of 25 or 50 mg to continue therapy with hydrochlorothiazide or to switch to chlorthalidone at a daily dose of 12.5 or 25 mg. The primary outcome was a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure resulting in hospitalization, urgent coronary revascularization for unstable angina, and non-cancer-related death. Safety was also assessed.
Results:
A total of 13,523 patients underwent randomization. The mean age was 72 years. At baseline, hydrochlorothiazide at a dose of 25 mg per day had been prescribed in 12,781 patients (94.5%). The mean baseline systolic blood pressure in each group was 139 mm Hg. At a median follow-up of 2.4 years, there was little difference in the occurrence of primary-outcome events between the chlorthalidone group (702 patients [10.4%]) and the hydrochlorothiazide group (675 patients [10.0%]) (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.16; P = 0.45). There were no between-group differences in the occurrence of any of the components of the primary outcome. The incidence of hypokalemia was higher in the chlorthalidone group than in the hydrochlorothiazide group (6.0% vs. 4.4%, P<0.001).
Conclusions:
In this large pragmatic trial of thiazide diuretics at doses commonly used in clinical practice, patients who received chlorthalidone did not have a lower occurrence of major cardiovascular outcome events or non-cancer-related deaths than patients who received hydrochlorothiazide. (Funded by the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02185417.).
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Thiazide-Class Diuretics
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology

