Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Prognostic factors of survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a competing risk model using the SEER
Ying Chen1, Qin Zhang1, Yantian Lv1
1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Background:
To explore the prognostic factors of survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using the competing risk analysis.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study. NSCLC patients with complete data were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. Outcomes were censored, cancer-specific mortality in NSCLC, and other-cause mortality. Gray's test was used in univariable analysis, and a multivariable Fine-Gray competing risk model with backward elimination was used to explore the prognostic factors of survival. The screened variables were incorporated into a random survival forest (RSF) model for the prediction of 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival in patients with NSCLC. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, the value of area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance.
Results:
Totally 1,251 eligible patients were included, 678 (54.20%) patients were cancer-specific mortality, and 128 (10.23%) patients were other-cause mortality. The median follow-up time was 26 months. Age, primary site, N stage, M stage, surgery type, tumor size, and lymph nodes (LNs) count were included in the multivariable Fine-Gray model for further analysis (P<0.05). The six most important features (surgery type, tumor size, M stage, LNs count, N stage, and primary site) were included in the competing risk analysis using the RSF model. The value of AUC for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival in the testing set were 0.796, 0.804, and 0.792, respectively. Calibration curves were well-fitted. DCA curves showed that the RSF model had similar or greater clinical net benefits in survival compared with the 8th edition the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging. The good performance of the RSF model under different surgery types, T, N, and M stages.
Conclusions:
We conducted a competing risk analysis using the RSF model for predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of NSCLC. We generated a web calculator (https://github.com/YingChen19/Prognostic-factors-of-long-term-survival-of-non-small-cell-lung-cancer), which could provide a convenient assessment and could help improve the prognosis and survival of NSCLC.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...