Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Vagus Nerve Stimulation As an Adjunctive Neurostimulation Tool in Treatment-resistant Depression
Published on: January 7, 2019
General practice management of depression among patients with coronary heart disease in Australia
Habiba Jahan1, Carla Bernardo2, David Gonzalez-Chica1,3
1Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, 115 Grenfell Street, Level 8, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Insights
Antidepressant prescribing for patients with new coronary heart disease (CHD) was slightly higher than for those with depression alone. Geographic location significantly impacted prescribing rates, highlighting a need for improved clinical practice in Australia.
Area of Science:
- General Practice
- Cardiology
- Psychiatry
Background:
- Incident depression is linked to increased coronary heart disease (CHD) morbidity and mortality.
- Effective treatment of depression in CHD patients can reduce future cardiac events.
- Understanding the identification and care of comorbid CHD and depression in general practice is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore antidepressant prescribing patterns for patients with comorbid coronary heart disease (CHD) and depression.
- To analyze the association between sociodemographic variables and antidepressant prescribing based on CHD status.
Main Methods:
- An open cohort study using de-identified electronic medical records from Australian general practices (MedicineInsight).
- Data from 880,900 patients aged 40+ years (2011-2018) were analyzed.
- Patients were classified by CHD status: newly recorded, previously recorded, or no history of CHD.
Main Results:
- Depression prevalence was 11.4% in newly recorded CHD, 10.5% in previously recorded CHD, and 9.6% in no CHD history.
- Antidepressant prescribing was slightly higher in newly recorded CHD (76.4%) compared to previously recorded CHD (71.6%) or no CHD history (69.5%).
- Geographic location showed significant differences in prescribing for males with newly recorded CHD and depression, with higher rates in major cities.
Conclusions:
- Antidepressant prescribing was marginally higher in newly recorded CHD patients with depression, but clinical significance is uncertain.
- Significant variations in antidepressant prescribing by geographic location warrant attention.
- Innovations in clinical practice are needed to address geographic disparities in care for patients with comorbid CHD and depression.
Background:
Incident depression is associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) and increased morbidity and mortality. Treatment of depression with antidepressants and psychotherapy can be beneficial for these patients to reduce the risk of further CHD events. Ongoing management of CHD and depression mainly occurs in the community, but little is known about the identification and care of patients with comorbid CHD and depression in general practice. This study explores the prescription of antidepressants for these patients by sociodemographic variables.
Methods:
This is an open cohort study with de-identified data based on electronic medical records of 880,900 regular patients aged 40 + years from a national general practice database in Australia (MedicineInsight). Data from 2011-2018 was used to classify patients as newly recorded CHD (CHD recorded in 2018 but not in previous years), previously recorded CHD (CHD recorded between 2011-2017) or no recorded history of CHD. Antidepressant prescribing in 2018 considered active ingredients and commercial brand names. The association between sociodemographic variables and antidepressant prescribing was tabulated according to the CHD status.
Results:
The proportion of current depression among patients with newly recorded CHD was 11.4% (95%CI 10.3-12.6), 10.5% among those with previously recorded CHD (95%CI 10.0-11.1) and 9.6% among those with no recorded history of CHD (95%CI 9.2-10.1). Antidepressant prescribing was slightly higher among those with newly recorded CHD (76.4%; 95%CI 72.1-80.6) than among those with previously recorded CHD (71.6%; 95%CI 69.9-73.2) or no history of CHD (69.5%; 95%CI 68.6-70.4). Among males with newly recorded CHD and depression, antidepressant prescribing was more frequent in major cities or inner regional areas (~ 81%) than in outer/remote Australia (66.6%; 95% CI 52.8-80.4%).
Conclusions:
Although antidepressant prescribing was slightly greater in those with newly recorded CHD compared to those with depression alone, its clinical significance is uncertain. Much larger differences in prescribing were seen by geographic location and could be addressed by innovations in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
04:33Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Connection Between Sleep Disorders and Cognitive Symptoms in Depression
Published on: April 26, 2024
08:15Network Pharmacology and Validation of the Antidepressant Mechanisms of Qiangzhifang in a Chronic Restraint Stress-induced Depression Rat Model
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Antidepressant Drugs: MAOIs and Other Agents
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management