Using electroencephalography to explore neurocognitive correlates of procedural proficiency: A pilot study to compare experts and novices during simulated endotracheal intubation

The objective of this study was to explore the use of EEG as a measure of neurocognitive engagement during a procedural task. In this observational study, self-reported cognitive load, observed performance, and EEG signatures in experts and novices were compared during simulated endotracheal intubation. Twelve medical students (novices) and eight senior anesthesiology trainees (experts) were included in the study. Experts reported significantly lower cognitive load (P < 0.001) and outperformed novices based on the observational checklist (P < 0.001). EEG signatures differed significantly between the experts and novices. Experts showed a greater increase in delta and theta band amplitudes, especially in temporal and frontal locations and in right occipital areas for delta. A machine learning algorithm showed 83.3 % accuracy for expert-novice skill classification using the selected EEG features. Performance scores were positively correlated (P < 0.05) with event-related amplitudes for delta and theta bands at locations where experts and novices showed significant differences. Increased delta and frontal/midline theta oscillations on EEG suggested that experts had better attentional control than novices. This pilot study provides initial evidence that EEG may be a useful, noninvasive measure of neurocognitive engagement in operational settings and that it has the potential to complement traditional clinical skills assessment.