Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

05:04
Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
1.1K
Mixed reality simulation for peripheral intravenous catheter placement training
Lauryn R Rochlen1, Elizabeth Putnam2, Robert Levine3,4
1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, 1H247 University Hospital, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. rochlenl@med.umich.edu.
BMC Medical Education
|December 17, 2022
Summary
Mixed reality (MR) trainers significantly improve peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) placement success rates. This innovative simulation technology enhances learning by allowing visualization of internal anatomy, proving beneficial for clinical skill development.
Area of Science:
- Medical Simulation
- Augmented Reality in Healthcare
- Vascular Access Training
Background:
- Traditional simulation lacks visualization of internal anatomy.
- Mixed reality (MR) offers projection of 3-D virtual anatomical images.
- This study evaluates an MR trainer for peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) placement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of a novel mixed reality trainer for PIVC insertion.
- To evaluate trainee performance and perceptions of the MR training tool.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-two participants performed PIVC placement on a mannequin using projected arm vein images.
- Performance was assessed via a checklist; participant perceptions were gathered through surveys.
- A two-week follow-up survey assessed clinical PIVC experiences post-training.
Main Results:
- First-attempt PIVC placement success rate was 77.4% (48/62).
- Complications like extravasation (17.7%) and hematoma (4.8%) were infrequent on the first attempt.
- 95.2% found visualizing internal structures useful; 93.5% agreed MR enhanced learning and should be integrated into training.
Conclusions:
- The MR trainer provides an effective environment for learning PIVC placement.
- High success rates and positive participant feedback indicate the tool's value.
- MR simulation tools show promise for bridging the gap between didactic learning and clinical practice.

