Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Symptom Assessment of Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Using an Allergen Exposure Chamber
Published on: March 3, 2023
Dynamic reaction picklist for improving allergy reaction documentation: A usability study
Liqin Wang1, Heekyong Park2, Sachin Vallamkonda3
1Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Objective:
To assess novel dynamic reaction picklists for improving allergy reaction documentation compared to a static reaction picklist.
Materials And Methods:
We developed three web-based user interfaces (UIs) mimicking the Mass General Brigham's EHR allergy module: the first and second UIs (i.e., UI-1D, UI-2D) implemented two dynamic reaction picklists with different ranking algorithms and the third UI (UI-3S) implemented a static reaction picklist like the one used in the current EHR. We recruited 18 clinicians to perform allergy entry for 10 test cases each via UI-1D and UI-3S, and another 18 clinicians via UI-2D and UI-3S. Primary measures were the number of free-text entries and time to complete the allergy entry. Clinicians were also interviewed using 30 questions before and after the data entry.
Results And Discussions:
Among 36 clinicians, less than half were satisfied with the current EHR reaction picklists, due to their incomprehensiveness, inefficiency, and lack of intuitiveness. The clinicians used significantly fewer free-text entries when using UI-1D or UI-2D compared to UI-3S (p < 0.05). The clinicians used on average 51 s (15 %) less time via UI-1D and 50 s (16 %) less time via UI-2D in completing the allergy entries versus UI-3S, and there was not a statistically significant difference in documentation time for either group between the dynamic and static UIs. Overall, 15-17 (83-94 %) clinicians rated UI-1D and 13-15 (72-83 %) clinicians rated UI-2D as efficient, easy to use, and useful, while less than half rated the same for UI-3S. Most clinicians reported that the dynamic reaction picklists always or often suggested appropriate reactions (n = 30, 83 %) and would decrease the free-text entries (n = 26, 72 %); nearly all preferred the dynamic picklist over the static picklist (n = 32, 89 %).
Conclusion:
We found that dynamic reaction picklists significantly reduced the number of free-text entries and could reduce the time for allergy documentation by 15%. Clinicians preferred the dynamic reaction picklist over the static picklist.
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions
Allergic Drug Reactions
Hypersensitivities
Types of Hypersensitivities
Hypersensitivity reactions are categorized into four types: Type 1, Type 2, Type 3, and Type 4. Each type has a distinct mechanism...
Cross-reactivity
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
Reaction Mechanisms
For instance, the decomposition of ozone appears to follow a mechanism with two steps:

