Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2025

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Assessment of Repeat Revascularization in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trials as a
Safi U Khan1, Ahmad N Lone2, Usman Ali Akbar3
1Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX.
Insights
Repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not a reliable surrogate for mortality in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. This meta-regression found no significant association between repeat procedures and mortality rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials Methodology
Background:
- The prognostic value of repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains uncertain.
- Understanding this association is crucial for guiding treatment decisions and interpreting clinical trial outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the association between repeat revascularization rates following PCI and mortality in patients with CAD.
- To determine if repeat revascularization can serve as a surrogate endpoint for mortality in trials comparing PCI with other revascularization strategies or optimal medical therapy (OMT).
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and random-effects meta-regression of 33 randomized controlled trials (21,735 patients) comparing PCI with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or OMT.
- Analyzed the association between repeat revascularization rates after PCI and relative risks (RR) of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.
- Assessed surrogacy using the coefficient of determination (R2), with a threshold of 0.80.
Main Results:
- Repeat revascularization was higher after PCI compared to CABG (RR: 2.45) but lower compared to OMT (RR: 0.64).
- Meta-regression revealed no significant association between repeat revascularization after PCI and all-cause mortality (RR: 1.01, R2=0.10) or cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.01, R2=0.09).
- Repeat revascularization did not meet the surrogacy threshold (R2=0.0 to 0.28) in comparisons of PCI versus CABG or PCI versus OMT.
Conclusions:
- Repeat revascularization following PCI is not a validated surrogate for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in patients with CAD.
- Findings were consistent across subgroup and multivariable analyses, reinforcing the lack of surrogacy.
- This highlights the need for mortality as a primary endpoint in clinical trials evaluating PCI strategies.
Abstract:
The association of repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with mortality is uncertain. To assess the association of repeat revascularization after PCI with mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We identified randomized controlled trials comparing PCI with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or optimal medical therapy (OMT) using electronic databases through January 1, 2022. We performed a random-effects meta-regression between repeat revascularization rates after PCI (absolute risk difference [%] between PCI and CABG or OMT) with the relative risks (RR) of mortality. We assessed surrogacy of repeat revascularization for mortality using the coefficient of determination (R2), with threshold of 0.80. In 33 trials (21,735 patients), at median follow-up of 4 (2-7) years, repeat revascularization was higher after PCI than CABG [RR: 2.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.99-3.03)], but lower vs OMT [RR: 0.64 (0.46-0.88)]. Overall, meta-regression showed that repeat revascularization rates after PCI had no significant association with all-cause mortality [RR: 1.01 (0.99-1.02); R2=0.10) or cardiovascular mortality [RR: 1.01 (CI: 0.99-1.03); R2=0.09]. In PCI vs CABG (R2=0.0) or PCI vs OMT trials (R2=0.28), repeat revascularization did not meet the threshold for surrogacy for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality (R2=0.0). We observed concordant results for subgroup analyses (enrollment time, follow-up, sample size, risk of bias, stent types, and coronary artery disease), and multivariable analysis adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, risk of bias, MI, and follow-up duration. In summary, this meta-regression did not establish repeat revascularization after PCI as a surrogate for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies