Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
Complications of implanted port catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters in chemotherapy-treated cancer
1Department of Hematology, Huanggang Central Hospital, China.
Background:
One of the most significant advancements in nursing technology for cancer patients has been the development of implantable port catheters and peripherally inserted central venous catheters. They create an essential, dependable route for subjects to receive chemotherapy, long-term infusions and nutritional care, and provide a site for regular blood draws.
Objectives:
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the complications of implanted port catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients.
Material And Methods:
A systematic literature search up to April 2022 was performed and a total of 11,801 articles have been retrieved. Of these, 5017 concerned peripherally inserted central catheters and 6784 implanted port catheters to administer chemotherapy. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to assess the complications of implanted port catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients using dichotomous and contentious methods with randomor fixed-effects models.
Results:
Peripherally inserted central catheters had significantly higher incidence of occlusion complications (OR: 5.43, 95% CI: 3.46-8.52, p < 0.001), longer durations of local infection (OR: 2.94, 95% CI: 2.17-4.00, p < 0.001), higher incidence of catheter-related infection (OR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.19-3.83, p = 0.01), higher rate of malposition (OR: 6.46, 95% CI: 2.93-14.27, p < 0.001), higher rates of catheter-related thrombosis (OR: 2.71, 95% CI: 1.90-3.87, p < 0.001), higher incidence of phlebitis complications (OR: 6.67, 95% CI: 2.94-15.11, p < 0.001), higher incidence of accidental removal (OR: 3.38, 95% CI: 1.97-5.81, p < 0.001), and a shorter catheter lifespan (MD: -233.16, 95% CI: -449.52--16.80, p = 0.03) in subjects undergoing chemotherapy compared to those in whom implanted port catheters were used.
Conclusion:
Implantable port catheter has advantages over peripherally inserted central catheter in decreasing cancer patients' complications. The outcomes provide evidence for practitioners to select which type of central venous catheters is better for cancer chemotherapy subject.
Related Concept Videos
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Peritoneal Dialysis III: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

