Gamma nail versus percutaneous compression plate for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a multicenter...

To compare functional outcomes, complication rates, and survival in patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated with percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) or gamma nail (GN).

A retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients treated with PCCP or GN for AO/OTA 31.A1 or AO/OTA 31.A2 fractures was conducted. Sixty-eight consecutive patients treated with PCCP between 2018 and 2020 were enrolled and matched with 68 patients with comparable characteristics treated with GN. The activities of daily living (ADL) index and specific scales for walking ability and need for walking aids at 4 months and 1 year after fracture fixation were chosen as primary outcomes. Postoperative complications and one-year survival were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Walking ability and ADLs index decreased and the need for walking aids increased in both groups compared to the prefracture state at both follow-up intervals (p < 0.001), regardless of the treatment received. There was no difference between the two implants in the rate of implant-related complications. One-year survival rate was 78.9% (95% CI 67.0-86.9) and 82.4% (95% CI 71.0-89.5) in patients undergoing PCCP or GN, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups.

Walking ability, ADLs, complication rate, and 1-year survival are not significantly different when patients undergoing PCCP or GN are compared. The choice of implant may not be decisive for the outcome of treatment of intertrochanteric fractures, provided that stable fixation is ensured.