Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
What is the best treatment for syndesmosis fixation? Suture-button or syndesmotic screw ? Bilateral CT-based early
Servet İğrek1, İbrahim Ulusoy1
1Selahaddin Eyyubi State Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Background:
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of syndesmotic screw (SS) and suture button (SB) on the reduction and fixation of syndesmosis via early postoperative bilateral computed tomography (CT).
Methods:
This single-center retrospective study included 76 patients aged ≥ 18 years with a unilateral syndesmosis injury. SS was applied to 40 patients and SB to 36 patients. The differences between the sides stabilized using SB or SS and the intact sides were analyzed using the parameters of tibio-fibular clear space (∆CS) and anterior or posterior sagittal translation (∆ST) depending on the orientation of the fibula. The cases in which the fibula was translocated to the posterior of the tibia after the change of ∆ST and ∆CS> 2 mm were evaluated as malreduction. Axial CT images taken from the level of syndesmosis fixation were divided into 4 zones according to the orientation angle of the implant sent from the fibula to the tibia.
Results:
No significant difference was found in the analyses performed between total patient group with malreduction and fixation groups in terms of ∆CS and ∆ST values (p = 0.708, p = 0.289). It was observed that the fixation material was in zone 3 in 54 patients and in zone 2 in 22 patients. No significant difference was found in the analyses performed between the SS and SB groups according to the implant zone (p = 0.191). In the SS group sent from Zone 2, the malreduction rate according to the ∆ST value of syndesmosis was found to be significantly higher than in the SB group (p = 0.008, p = 0.003).
Conclusion:
When the implant is applied with the correct technique, there is no difference between SS and SB in terms of early postoperative reduction. When the SS is advanced at an inappropriate angle, it negatively affects the reduction of the fibula, while SB can better tolerate angle errors up to certain degrees due to its flexible structure. Therefore, it can be presumed that the suture button system is a more convenient method in the reduction and fixation of syndesmosis than the syndesmotic screw.
Level Of Evidence:
Level IV.
