Association between surveillance imaging and survival outcomes in small bowel neuroendocrine tumors

Akie Watanabe1, Geoffrey Mckendry1, Lily Yip1

  • 1Department of Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Abstract

Insights

Frequent surveillance imaging after small bowel neuroendocrine tumor (SB-NET) resection predicts recurrence but not overall survival. Less frequent, longer-duration imaging may optimize detection of treatable recurrences.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Inconsistent surveillance guidelines exist for small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NETs) post-resection.
  • The impact of surveillance imaging on recurrence and survival remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the association between surveillance imaging frequency and recurrence rates in SB-NET patients.
  • To determine if surveillance imaging impacts overall survival (OS) in SB-NET patients.
  • To identify optimal surveillance strategies for SB-NETs.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 195 patients with completely resected SB-NETs (2004-2015).
  • Analysis of associations between imaging frequency, recurrence, post-recurrence treatment, and OS using univariate and Cox-regression models.
  • Comparison of imaging frequency (including CT scans) between patients with and without recurrence.

Main Results:

  • Higher imaging frequency predicted SB-NET recurrence (HR 2.52, p<0.001).
  • Patients treated for recurrence had similar OS to those without recurrence (median 152 vs. 164 months, p=0.25).
  • Imaging frequency did not influence OS in patients with treated recurrence (p=0.65).
  • Recurrent disease detection peaked at 17% in Year 9.
  • Patients with recurrence underwent more CT scans (1.47/year) than those without (1.02/year).

Conclusions:

  • Surveillance imaging frequency is linked to recurrence detection but not overall survival.
  • Less frequent, longer-duration surveillance may be more effective for capturing clinically relevant, treatable recurrences.
  • Current surveillance strategies may require adjustment to balance detection rates with patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos