Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
Exploring the Ethics of the Parental Role in Parent-Clinician Conflict
Insights
Understanding parent-clinician disagreements in pediatric care requires recognizing the ethical weight of the parental role. Exploring role-based perspectives can improve conflict resolution and shared decision-making for children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Bioethics
- Medical Ethics
- Parent-Clinician Relationships
Background:
- Disagreements between parents and clinicians are common in pediatric healthcare.
- Existing literature underexplores role-differentiated approaches to these conflicts.
- The ethical dimensions of the parental role are often less recognized than the clinician's role.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore how differing perceptions of roles influence parent-clinician conflicts in pediatric care.
- To argue for the ethical significance of the parental role in bioethical discussions.
- To provide a role-based framework for understanding and resolving disagreements.
Main Methods:
- Review of normative and empirical literature on parental roles.
- Analysis of role-based appeals in healthcare contexts.
- Application of role theory to pediatric bioethics.
Main Results:
- Parental roles possess social and legal value, but their ethical content is often overlooked.
- A role-based lens can illuminate the underlying reasons for parent-clinician disagreements.
- Recognizing the ethical weight of the parental role is crucial for effective conflict resolution.
Conclusions:
- A role-differentiated approach offers valuable insights into pediatric bioethical dilemmas.
- Ethical consideration of the parental role can enhance shared decision-making.
- This framework can guide clinicians and ethicists in managing parent-clinician conflicts.
Abstract:
In pediatric health care, parents and clinicians sometimes have competing ideas of what should be done for a child. In this article, we explore the idea that notions of what should be done for a child partly depend on one's perception of one's role in the child's life and care. Although role-based appeals are common in health care, role-differentiated approaches to understanding parent-clinician conflicts are underexplored in the pediatric bioethics literature. We argue that, while the parental role is recognized as having social content or value, and sometimes legal force, it is not always recognized as having ethical content or value, as the clinician's role is. We draw together key insights from the normative and empirical literature on parental roles to show how a role-based lens might inform clinicians' and clinical ethicists' approach to cases in which parents and clinicians disagree.
More Related Videos
08:59The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs
Published on: October 13, 2017
05:04A Common Marmoset Model of Mother-Infant Intervention for Breastfeeding Disorders in the Presence of Paternal Inhibition and Maternal Neglect
Published on: September 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethical Dilemmas II
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...