Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Behavioral and electrophysiological findings of central auditory processing in children and adolescents undergoing musical training.

CoDAS·2026
Same author

Post-masking in cortical auditory evoked potentials following acoustically controlled auditory training: a case report.

CoDAS·2026
Same author

Auditory processing from the perspective of auditory electrophysiological assessment.

CoDAS·2026
Same author

Validation of a freely distributable software for the analysis of electrophysiological signals: Smart Tools for Evoked Potentials (STEP).

CoDAS·2025
Same author

Effect of modulated masking on electrophysiological and behavioral measures.

CoDAS·2025
Same author

Effect of Modulated Masking on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential in Normal Hearing Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

International archives of otorhinolaryngology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning
08:43

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

10.4K

Masking release in cortical auditory evoked potentials with speech stimulus.

Mônyka Ferreira Borges Rocha1, Denise Costa Menezes2, Danielle Samara Bandeira Duarte3

  • 1Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde da Comunicação Humana, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE - Recife (PE), Brasil.

Codas
|December 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Modulated noise shows a lower masking effect on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials (CAEPs) in young adults compared to strong steady noise. This indicates a better masking release with modulated noise, impacting amplitude and electrophysiological thresholds.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.6K
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 16, 2025

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning
08:43

Combined Shuttle-Box Training with Electrophysiological Cortex Recording and Stimulation as a Tool to Study Perception and Learning

Published on: October 22, 2015

10.4K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.6K
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Audiology
  • Speech-Language Pathology

Background:

  • Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials (CAEPs) are crucial for assessing auditory processing.
  • Masking noise is used to evaluate auditory system function under challenging listening conditions.
  • Understanding the impact of different noise types on CAEPs is vital for audiological assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of different masking noise types on CAEPs in young adults.
  • To compare the masking effects of steady versus modulated noise on speech stimuli.
  • To determine the masking release based on CAEP measurements.

Main Methods:

  • CAEPs were recorded in 14 young adults (19-28 years) with normal hearing.
  • A synthetic speech stimulus /ba/ was used with simultaneous Speech Shaped Noise.
  • Three masking conditions were tested: weak steady noise (30 dB SPLep), strong steady noise (65 dB SPLep), and modulated noise (30 & 65 dB SPLep at 25Hz).

Main Results:

  • Strong steady noise increased latencies (except P2) and worsened wave morphology compared to other conditions.
  • Modulated noise yielded more significant amplitude measures for cortical components (P1, N1, P2) than strong steady noise.
  • Average electrophysiological thresholds indicated a 11.7 dB difference, favoring modulated noise (49 dB SPLep) over strong steady noise (60 dB SPLep).

Conclusions:

  • Modulated noise exhibits a reduced masking effect on CAEP amplitude measurements compared to strong steady noise.
  • The 11.7 dB difference in electrophysiological thresholds quantifies the masking release, favoring modulated noise.
  • These findings suggest modulated noise is less disruptive for auditory processing assessment using CAEPs.